“My screening counts need a clean PRISMA diagram.”
You already have the review numbers and need them organised into a readable study-selection flow without changing the supplied counts.
Academic Support for Evidence Synthesis
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis Graphics Service
Turn verified screening counts, meta-analysis output, risk-of-bias results and included-study information into clear, publication-ready evidence-synthesis figures without changing the underlying research evidence.
✓PRISMA flow diagrams and study-selection visuals
✓Forest and funnel plots from verified meta-analysis output
✓Risk-of-bias graphics, evidence maps and review-summary figures
✓Consistent figure styling for your review manuscript
Evidence-faithful graphicsFigures are built from your supplied or verified review data rather than invented values.
Publication-ready presentationReview figures are structured for clear manuscript communication and supplied journal requirements.
Complete review figure setPRISMA, meta-analysis plots, risk-of-bias graphics and summary visuals can be coordinated as one set.
Service-specific turnaroundTimelines range from 1 working day for a PRISMA diagram to 3–5 working days for a complete package.
Pricing & Delivery
01
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis Graphics Service Pricing & Delivery
For a standard evidence-synthesis graphics requirement, Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis Graphics Service starts from ₹7,500 per review-graphics project. The included scope centres on verified screening or analysis-output review, evidence-figure planning, consistent visual presentation and final publication-ready graphics, with additional requirements quoted against the number and complexity of the required figures.
verified screening-count or meta-analysis-output review
PRISMA flow-diagram preparation from supplied counts
forest and funnel graphics from verified analysis output
risk-of-bias, evidence-map or review-summary visual design
consistent styling across the approved review figure set
publication-ready and editable versions where supported
Complete graphics packages, multiple analyses, unusual evidence maps, changed screening counts, materially revised meta-analysis output, new figures, missing source information, additional output formats, or accelerated deadlines require a custom quotation. A shorter deadline can be assessed after the verified review data and requested scope are reviewed; accelerated delivery is confirmed only when feasible for that assignment.
02
Common Research Needs We Solve
Typical situations in which review authors need clearer, more consistent evidence-synthesis graphics.
“My meta-analysis output needs a publication-quality forest plot.”
You have verified analysis output but need a consistent visual that makes study labels, estimates and intervals easier to read.
“I need a funnel plot that matches the rest of my figures.”
Your meta-analysis figure set needs unified typography, spacing and visual treatment for a coherent manuscript presentation.
“My risk-of-bias results are hard to scan.”
You have completed risk-of-bias results and need them translated into a clear visual summary without changing any judgement.
“I need an evidence map for a large body of studies.”
Your included-study information needs a more structured visual overview than a dense table alone can provide.
“My search and selection process needs a clear visual flow.”
You want the literature-search or study-selection pathway communicated in a concise, manuscript-ready format.
“I need study characteristics summarised visually.”
You have verified included-study information and want a compact figure that highlights the structure of the evidence base.
“My review figures look inconsistent across the manuscript.”
You need the evidence-synthesis graphics aligned into one restrained visual system without altering the underlying evidence.
03
What We Create
A focused set of graphics for systematic reviews, scoping reviews, meta-analyses and other evidence-synthesis work.
PRISMA Flow Diagrams
Study-selection diagrams created from the screening counts and PRISMA information you provide.
Study-Selection & Literature-Search Visuals
Clear diagrams that show how records progress through identification, screening, eligibility and inclusion stages.
Forest Plots
Publication-ready forest graphics based on researcher-supplied verified meta-analysis output.
Funnel Plots
Funnel graphics prepared from the verified analysis inputs supplied for the requested meta-analysis.
Risk-of-Bias Graphics
Traffic-light or summary-style visuals based on completed risk-of-bias judgements supplied by the researcher.
Evidence Maps
Structured overview graphics that organise supplied included-study information across meaningful categories.
Bibliometric Maps
Review-related bibliometric visualisations prepared from the verified mapping output or information supplied for the project.
Study-Characteristic Graphics
Visual summaries that make verified included-study characteristics easier to scan than a dense table alone.
Review-Summary Figures
Evidence-synthesis figures that communicate the structure or summary of the review using supplied information.
04
Who This Service Is For
For people and teams already conducting or reporting evidence-synthesis research who need professional figures from verified inputs.
05
Evidence-Synthesis Areas We Support
The service is defined by review methodology and evidence-synthesis outputs rather than by a single academic discipline.
06
What We Need From You
The exact inputs depend on the figure set. We only build from information you supply or verify.
Verified Review Inputs
Provide the source information that directly supports the graphics you want created.
✓Your review type: systematic, scoping, meta-analysis, umbrella, literature review or other evidence-synthesis work.
✓Screening counts and PRISMA information when a study-selection diagram is requested.
✓Verified meta-analysis output when forest or funnel plots are requested.
✓Completed risk-of-bias results when a risk-of-bias graphic is requested.
✓Included-study information needed for evidence maps, study-characteristic graphics or review summaries.
Submission & Presentation Context
These details help us align the figure set to your intended use without guessing requirements.
✓Current target-journal figure or artwork instructions when the graphics are for submission.
✓The set of figures you need so the visual system can be kept consistent across the manuscript.
✓Any existing draft figures you want visually standardised, if available.
✓Preferred figure order, labels or manuscript terminology where relevant.
✓Your preferred deadline so scope and timing can be confirmed before work begins.
07
What You Receive
Deliverables are limited to the review graphics agreed for your project and the formats supported for those figure types.
Publication-Ready Review Graphics
Your package can include the evidence-synthesis figures agreed for the project.
✓PRISMA-compliant diagram based on the screening numbers you provide.
✓Forest and funnel graphics where applicable to the verified meta-analysis output supplied.
✓Risk-of-bias, evidence-map, study-characteristic or review-summary visuals where included in scope.
✓A consistent visual treatment across the agreed review figure set.
Final & Editable Versions Where Supported
The catalogue supports publication-ready and editable versions where the requested figure type and agreed workflow allow them.
✓Publication-ready versions prepared for the intended manuscript or report use.
✓Editable versions where supported for the agreed figure type.
✓Export format aligned with supplied target-journal requirements where technically supported.
✓Figure content kept faithful to the researcher-supplied or verified evidence.
08
Illustrative Review Graphics
Demonstration layouts showing the kinds of evidence-synthesis figures supported. These are not presented as client publications.
Illustrative Example
PRISMA 2020 Flow Diagram
Structured study-selection flow created from supplied screening counts.
Illustrative Example
Forest Plot
Meta-analysis figure based on verified effect-estimate output supplied by the researcher.
Illustrative Example
Funnel Plot
Publication-style funnel graphic created from verified meta-analysis inputs.
Illustrative Example
Risk-of-Bias Traffic-Light Plot
Visual summary of completed risk-of-bias judgements supplied for included studies.
Illustrative Example
Evidence Map
Category-based overview of supplied included-study information.
Illustrative Example
Literature-Search Flow
Compact visual showing search sources and progression into the review workflow.
Illustrative Example
Study-Characteristic Summary
Graphic summarising verified categories or characteristics across included studies.
Illustrative Example
Review-Summary Figure
High-level visual summary built from supplied evidence-synthesis information.
09
Before & After: From Rough Sketch to Clear Research Model
A rough working sketch is translated into a structured academic visual while preserving the supplied research meaning.
Researcher / supervisor sketch
Working ideas, handwritten links and early figure structure may communicate the intended relationships but still need a clearer academic presentation.
Structured academic model
The same supplied research logic is organised into a cleaner, consistent model with clearer hierarchy, alignment, labels and presentation-ready structure.
Evidence-preservation rule: data values, screening counts, effect estimates, p-values, statistical significance, sample sizes and research conclusions are not changed to make a figure look better.
10
Our Process
A transparent workflow from researcher-supplied review information to the agreed final graphics.
Share Verified Inputs
Provide the review type, screening counts, meta-analysis output, risk-of-bias results or study information relevant to your figure set.
Confirm Figure Scope
We identify which PRISMA, forest, funnel, risk-of-bias, evidence-map or summary figures are required and note supplied submission specifications.
Create the Draft Graphics
The supplied evidence is translated into clear layouts with consistent labels, spacing, hierarchy and visual treatment.
Review Against Your Data
You check the draft against your verified counts, analysis output, judgements and manuscript terminology and send refinements within the agreed brief.
Receive Final Files
Approved publication-ready graphics and editable versions where supported are delivered in the agreed formats.
11
Turnaround
Standard timing depends on whether you need one review diagram, a plot set or a coordinated graphics package.
For a PRISMA flow diagram when the required screening information is complete and ready to use.
For a forest and funnel graphic set based on verified meta-analysis output supplied for the project.
For a coordinated evidence-synthesis figure package within the agreed scope.
Unusually large, incomplete or materially changed projects may require the final delivery schedule to be confirmed after the files and scope are reviewed.
12
Journal & Submission Requirements
When your review figures are being prepared for a journal, current official figure instructions should be supplied rather than guessed.
Target-Journal Artwork Instructions
Share the current official figure guidance when your journal specifies dimensions, file types, figure naming, labelling or other artwork requirements.
PRISMA Information
Provide the final screening information that should appear in the diagram. Numeric counts are not inferred or invented when they are missing.
Figure Labels & Manuscript Terminology
Use the wording, abbreviations and study labels that are correct for your review so visual clarity does not change the meaning of the evidence.
Final Author Verification
Before submission, verify the completed graphics against the review dataset, analysis output, risk-of-bias results and manuscript text you supplied.
13
Revisions
Revision rounds and scope are confirmed before work begins; we do not assume a fixed number when none has been specified.
Refinement Within the Approved Brief
Typical refinements can include corrections to labels, hierarchy, spacing, alignment, legend treatment or other presentation details while the underlying verified evidence and agreed figure scope remain unchanged.
Changes That May Become New Scope
New figures, changed screening counts, changed analysis, a substantially different evidence set, or new journal specifications introduced after completion may require the scope and timing to be reconfirmed.
14
Academic Integrity & Data Fidelity
Visual improvement must never become evidence manipulation. The service is for presentation and communication of researcher-supplied or verified review evidence.
What We Can Improve
Layout, visual hierarchy, spacing, alignment, labelling, typography, consistency and the clarity with which supplied screening or analysis information is communicated.
What We Do Not Change
We do not fabricate screening counts, invent results, change effect estimates or p-values, manipulate statistical significance, selectively remove inconvenient evidence, create fake citations, misrepresent authorship or alter conclusions merely to make a figure look stronger. Journal acceptance is not guaranteed.
15
Frequently Asked Questions
Practical questions about inputs, figure types, formats, timing, revisions and evidence integrity.
What does the Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis Graphics Service include?+
The service includes PRISMA flow diagrams, study-selection visuals, forest plots, funnel plots, risk-of-bias graphics, evidence maps, literature-search flows, bibliometric maps, study-characteristic graphics and review-summary figures.
What do I need to provide for a PRISMA flow diagram?+
Provide your review type, screening counts and the PRISMA information needed for the stages you want shown. The diagram is prepared from the numbers you supply rather than from invented screening data.
Can you create forest and funnel plots from my meta-analysis?+
Yes, where applicable. Provide verified meta-analysis output and the information needed to identify the studies and effect estimates. The graphic is prepared from that verified analysis output.
Can you prepare risk-of-bias graphics?+
Yes. Risk-of-bias graphics are within scope when you provide the completed risk-of-bias results that should be visualised.
What file formats will I receive?+
The service provides publication-ready figures and, where supported for the agreed figure type, editable versions. Exact export formats are confirmed for the project and can be aligned with supplied target-journal requirements where technically supported.
How long does systematic review graphics work take?+
A PRISMA diagram typically takes 1 working day, a forest/funnel set 1–2 working days, and a complete review graphics package 3–5 working days. Unusually large, incomplete or materially changed projects may require the final delivery schedule to be confirmed after review.
How are revisions handled?+
Revision rounds and scope are confirmed before work begins. Refinements within the approved brief are handled differently from new scope such as changed analysis, a new figure, new screening counts or new journal specifications after completion.
Can you follow my target journal's figure requirements?+
Yes, when you provide the current official requirements. Relevant dimensions, permitted file types, figure conventions and other supplied specifications can be applied where they are applicable to the requested graphics.
Can you change screening counts or effect estimates to improve the figure?+
No. The service improves visual presentation but does not fabricate or alter screening counts, effect estimates, confidence intervals, p-values, statistical significance, sample sizes or research conclusions.
Can I request an evidence map or study-characteristic graphic instead of a meta-analysis plot?+
Yes. Evidence maps, study-characteristic graphics, literature-search flows, bibliometric maps and review-summary figures are included in the service scope when the required underlying information is supplied.
Are the sample visuals on this page actual client publications?+
No. The sample visuals are illustrative demonstrations of the kinds of evidence-synthesis graphics supported by the service and are not presented as client publications, journal acceptances or named research projects.
How should I handle confidential or unpublished review material?+
Tell us about any institution-specific confidentiality, NDA or file-handling requirement before sharing sensitive or unpublished material so the project-handling requirement can be confirmed.
Review Graphics Enquiry
Prepare Your Evidence-Synthesis Figures
Tell us which review graphics you need and the status of your underlying review data. Detailed screening counts, verified analysis output, risk-of-bias results and journal instructions can be shared through the agreed project channel after the enquiry is reviewed.
Review typeSystematic, scoping, meta-analysis, umbrella or other evidence synthesis.
Figure setPRISMA, forest, funnel, risk-of-bias, evidence map or summary graphics.
Verified inputsHave screening counts, analysis output or risk-of-bias results ready for the relevant figures.
Submission contextKeep current journal figure instructions ready when journal-specific preparation is required.
Start Your Review Graphics Project
A concise enquiry form to help us understand your figure requirements. This form does not upload research files.
1 Working DayPRISMA Diagram1–2 Working DaysForest / Funnel Set3–5 Working DaysComplete Package
This form collects enquiry details only and does not upload files. Keep your screening counts, PRISMA information, verified meta-analysis output, risk-of-bias results, included-study information and current journal instructions ready to share through the agreed project channel after review.