What Are the Different Statuses for a Manuscript Submitted to the Journal Advanced Materials?
By Dr. Aanya Mehta
Research Writer & Professional Business Communicator
Submitting a paper to Advanced Materials can be exciting, but checking the manuscript-tracking system afterward can quickly become stressful. A status may remain unchanged for several days, shift unexpectedly, or use terminology that does not clearly tell you whether your paper is undergoing editorial assessment, external peer review, or a final decision.
If you are searching for what are the different statuses for a manuscript submitted to the journal Advanced Materials, the most important point is that the journal is published by Wiley, and current submissions are tracked through the Wiley Authors environment. Wiley’s present submission system uses relatively broad author-facing statuses such as Submitted, In Screening, Under Review, In Revision, Accepted, and Rejected. “Under Review” can cover both editorial assessment and external peer review rather than identifying every internal editorial step separately.
This is important because researchers often try to interpret every status change as a signal about their chances of acceptance. In reality, manuscript-status labels primarily indicate where a submission sits operationally. They usually do not tell you whether reviewers are positive, whether an editor is leaning toward rejection, or how soon a decision will arrive.
Advanced Materials also has a selective editorial process. The journal’s peer-review activities are managed by professional in-house editors, and the responsible editor ultimately makes the publication decision after considering the scientific case and peer-review reports.
This guide explains the major statuses you may encounter, what they normally mean, what may be happening behind the scenes, and when an author should—or should not—contact the editorial office.
Quick Answer: What Are the Different Statuses for an Advanced Materials Manuscript?
For manuscripts handled in the current Wiley Authors submission environment, the main author-visible states include:
- Draft
- Submitted
- In Screening
- Under Review
- In Revision
- Accepted
- Accepted, Under Review for Production
- Accepted, Updates Requested
- Rejected
- Withdrawn
- Replaced
Wiley officially explains that Under Review is a broad status. It means the manuscript has passed initial screening and may be assigned to an editor; the status can include both editorial review and potential external peer review. Therefore, seeing “Under Review” does not necessarily prove that external referees are currently reviewing your manuscript.
For Advanced Materials specifically, manuscripts judged potentially suitable for the journal can proceed through editorial evaluation and peer review, after which the editor may accept the paper, reject it, or request revisions. Reviewers can recommend outcomes such as publication without revision, publication after minor revision, reconsideration after major revision, transfer, or rejection, but the editor makes the final decision.
The safest approach is therefore to interpret the status as a workflow indicator, not as a prediction of acceptance.
Key Takeaways
- Advanced Materials is a Wiley journal, and current manuscript tracking is integrated with Wiley Authors.
- Submitted confirms that the submission process has been completed and a manuscript number is normally assigned.
- In Screening means the manuscript is undergoing preliminary checks.
- Under Review is broader than many authors assume and can include editorial assessment as well as external peer review.
- A long period under one status is not automatically negative; editorial workload and reviewer availability can affect timing.
- In Revision means the editor has invited the authors to revise the manuscript rather than issuing a final acceptance.
- Acceptance may still be followed by file or production checks before publication.
- Status labels may differ from older screenshots, forum discussions, or manuscripts originally handled through legacy editorial systems.
What This Page Covers
This guide explains:
- The current Wiley manuscript-status terminology relevant to Advanced Materials
- What happens immediately after manuscript submission
- What “In Screening” and “Under Review” mean
- How to distinguish editorial evaluation from external peer review
- What revision and decision statuses mean
- What happens after acceptance
- Which status changes are normal
- When researchers should contact the editorial office
Table of Contents
- Why Advanced Materials Manuscript Statuses Can Be Confusing
- How Advanced Materials Handles Submitted Manuscripts
- Complete Advanced Materials Manuscript Status Guide
- Draft
- Submitted
- In Screening
- Under Review
- In Revision
- Decision and Rejection Statuses
- Accepted and Production-Related Statuses
- What Happens During External Peer Review?
- Common Status Sequences
- How Long Should Each Stage Take?
- When Should You Contact the Journal?
- Common Mistakes When Interpreting Statuses
- Practical Examples
- Manuscript Status Checklist
- How Contentxprtz Can Help
- Summary
- FAQs
- About the Author
- Conclusion
Why Advanced Materials Manuscript Statuses Can Be Confusing
Manuscript tracking appears simple, but the status visible to an author often represents several internal actions.
For example, Wiley describes Under Review as a stage that may include assignment to an editor, editorial review, and potential external peer review. That means the phrase should not always be interpreted literally as “two or three referees are reading my manuscript right now.”
This distinction matters particularly for a highly selective journal such as Advanced Materials. Before a manuscript reaches full external review, editors may need to consider questions such as:
- Does the manuscript fit the journal’s scope?
- Is the advance sufficiently important for the journal’s readership?
- Is the work scientifically compelling?
- Is the presentation clear enough for evaluation?
- Does the manuscript satisfy fundamental submission and publishing requirements?
- Should external reviewers be invited?
Administrative checks, editorial assessment, reviewer invitations, reviewer acceptance or decline, completed reports, and editorial decision-making can therefore occur without every internal action being displayed as a separate author-facing status.
A Note About Older Advanced Materials Status Terminology
Authors searching discussion forums sometimes encounter terms such as:
- With Editor
- Assigned to Editor
- Reviewer Invited
- Reviewers Assigned
- Under Review
- Required Reviews Completed
- Decision in Process
- Awaiting Decision
Such labels may appear in older publishing systems or other journals, but they should not automatically be treated as the current official Advanced Materials status sequence.
Wiley’s current author documentation lists broader states including Submitted, In Screening, Under Review, In Revision, Accepted, Rejected, Withdrawn, and Replaced.
This is particularly relevant because Wiley has been moving journals into its newer Wiley Authors workflow. Authors should interpret the exact wording displayed on their own dashboard rather than assuming that a status sequence found in an old online discussion still applies.
How Advanced Materials Handles Submitted Manuscripts
Advanced Materials uses professional in-house editors to manage manuscripts and oversee peer review and editorial decision-making.
At a high level, the process can be understood as:
Submission → Initial checks → Editorial assessment → Possible external peer review → Editorial decision → Revision, rejection, or acceptance → Production
The visible Wiley Authors status may compress several of these steps.
Reviewers provide scientific evaluations and recommendations, but the responsible editor makes the decision after considering the manuscript, the authors’ arguments where relevant, and the reviewers’ reports.
Therefore, peer review is not a voting system. Two favorable reports do not automatically guarantee acceptance, and a critical report does not automatically mean rejection.
Complete Guide to Advanced Materials Manuscript Statuses
The following table summarizes the current Wiley submission statuses most relevant to authors.
| Status | What It Generally Means | What the Author Should Usually Do |
|---|---|---|
| Draft | Submission has not been completed | Finish and submit the manuscript |
| Submitted | Submission was successfully completed | Wait for initial processing |
| In Screening | Standard preliminary checks are taking place | Usually no action |
| Under Review | Editorial assessment and/or potential external peer review is taking place | Wait unless contacted |
| In Revision | Editor has requested a revision | Prepare revision and response |
| Accepted | Final accept decision has been recorded | Follow post-acceptance instructions |
| Accepted, Under Review for Production | Accepted manuscript is being checked before production | Respond if updates are requested |
| Accepted, Updates Requested | Post-acceptance changes or files are required | Submit requested updates |
| Rejected | Editorial process ended with rejection | Read decision letter and plan next step |
| Withdrawn | Manuscript has been removed from consideration | Contact journal if unexpected |
| Replaced | Administrative replacement by a newer submission | Use the active replacement record |
These descriptions closely follow Wiley’s current official submission-status guidance.
1. Draft
Draft means that your manuscript has not yet been formally submitted.
You may have uploaded files and entered author information, but until the submission process has been completed, the manuscript remains a draft.
At this stage, the journal has not begun scientific evaluation.
Before completing submission, check:
- Manuscript files
- Title and abstract
- Author names and affiliations
- Corresponding-author information
- Supporting information
- Required declarations
- Data availability information where applicable
- Figures and tables
- Journal-specific requirements
Wiley notes that journal-specific formatting and submission requirements should always be checked against the journal’s Author Guidelines.
2. Submitted
Submitted means that you have successfully completed the submission process and sent the manuscript to the journal.
Wiley states that once a manuscript is successfully submitted, the system automatically assigns a unique manuscript number, and the corresponding author will normally receive notification by email.
This is an administrative milestone rather than evidence that the manuscript has already been evaluated scientifically.
Behind the scenes, the next steps may include:
- File checks
- Verification of required information
- Administrative screening
- Journal-policy checks
- Editorial-office processing
- Preparation for editorial assessment
Is “Submitted” a positive sign?
It is neutral.
It confirms that your paper entered the system successfully. It tells you nothing about the eventual editorial outcome.
3. In Screening
In Screening means that the manuscript is undergoing standard preliminary checks.
This is an official Wiley status.
Screening can involve administrative or publishing-policy checks before the manuscript moves further into editorial evaluation.
Authors should avoid assuming that screening is equivalent to scientific peer review.
Possible issues that may need resolution include incomplete submission information, unsuitable files, required declarations, or other submission requirements.
Does In Screening mean my paper has passed the editor?
No.
It generally means the manuscript is still at an early processing stage.
Should I contact the journal if it remains In Screening?
Not immediately.
Short periods at this stage are normal. If it remains unchanged for an unusually extended period and you are concerned, a concise query to the editorial office can be appropriate.
4. Under Review
Under Review is one of the most misunderstood manuscript statuses.
Wiley’s official explanation states that a manuscript in this stage has passed initial screening and may be assigned to an editor. Wiley further explains that the stage covers both editorial review and potential external peer review.
Therefore:
Under Review does not necessarily mean that external reviewers have already accepted invitations and are actively reviewing your paper.
The manuscript might be:
- With an editor for assessment
- Being considered for external review
- Awaiting reviewer selection
- Awaiting responses to reviewer invitations
- With one or more reviewers
- Awaiting an additional reviewer
- Being assessed after reports have arrived
- Under further editorial consideration
The author-facing dashboard may not reveal these distinctions.
Is Under Review a Good Sign at Advanced Materials?
It is generally more advanced than In Screening, but it should still be interpreted cautiously.
If a manuscript has moved past initial screening, it has progressed further in the editorial workflow. However, Wiley explicitly includes editorial review within this state, so you should not assume that it has definitely entered full external peer review.
The eventual decision may still be:
- Rejection
- Invitation to revise
- Acceptance
- Potential transfer recommendation
What Happens During Advanced Materials Peer Review?
Advanced Materials’ reviewer guidance shows that reviewers evaluate the scientific and scholarly merits of submitted work and provide recommendations to the editors.
Depending on manuscript type and circumstances, reviewer recommendations may include:
- Publish without revision
- Publish after minor revision
- Reconsider after major revision
- Transfer to another journal
- Reject
However, the responsible editor makes the final decision and is not mechanically bound by reviewer recommendations.
This is an important distinction for authors.
A reviewer might recommend minor revision while the editor decides that broader concerns remain. Conversely, an apparently demanding review may still lead to a revision invitation rather than rejection.
Why Can Under Review Last a Long Time?
Peer review depends heavily on human availability.
Possible causes include:
- Difficulty identifying suitable specialists
- Reviewers declining invitations
- Reviewers not responding
- Reviewers requesting extensions
- Need for an additional opinion
- Delayed reviewer reports
- Conflicting reports requiring editorial consideration
- Complex or interdisciplinary manuscripts
- Editor workload
Wiley specifically notes that several factors influence the duration of the Under Review stage, including reviewer availability.
A long review is therefore not, by itself, a negative signal.
5. In Revision
In Revision means that the editor has asked the authors to revise the manuscript.
This is not a final acceptance.
A revision decision usually means that the editor sees a possible route forward if the authors satisfactorily address the concerns raised.
Reviewer recommendations at Advanced Materials distinguish between relatively limited revisions and more substantial revisions. For example, minor revision can involve presentation improvements or relatively straightforward corrections, whereas major revision may require substantial rewriting or additional scientific work.
What Should You Do After Receiving a Revision Decision?
Read the decision letter carefully before editing anything.
A disciplined revision process should normally include:
- Read the editor’s comments separately from the reviewer reports.
- Identify every requested change.
- Group comments into scientific, methodological, presentation, and technical issues.
- Revise the manuscript systematically.
- Prepare a point-by-point response.
- State exactly where each change was made.
- Explain respectfully when you disagree with a reviewer.
- Check that new text does not create contradictions elsewhere.
- Proofread the full revised manuscript.
- Submit all requested files.
A response letter should not merely say “corrected” or “done.” It should make it easy for the editor and reviewers to verify your response.
Does a Revision Mean the Paper Will Be Accepted?
No.
A revision invitation is encouraging because the manuscript remains under active consideration, but it is not a guarantee of acceptance.
After resubmission, the manuscript may:
- Return to the editor
- Return to the original reviewers
- Be sent to additional reviewers
- Receive another revision request
- Be accepted
- Be rejected
Advanced Materials’ reviewer guidance specifically notes that reviewers may be asked to evaluate revised versions.
6. Rejected
Rejected means that the submission process has ended with a reject decision.
Wiley lists Rejected as a final submission state.
A rejection can occur at different points:
- During early editorial evaluation
- After detailed editorial assessment
- Following external peer review
- After revision
- Following unsuccessful reconsideration
The decision letter matters far more than the dashboard label because it explains why the manuscript was not accepted.
What Should You Do After Rejection?
First, distinguish between:
Journal-fit or priority rejection
and
Substantive scientific rejection
If the research may fit another journal, carefully revise the manuscript before resubmitting elsewhere rather than immediately sending an unchanged version.
Wiley journals may also use a refer-and-transfer process through which a manuscript that is not accepted can potentially be recommended to another suitable Wiley journal.
7. Accepted
Accepted means the journal has recorded an Accept decision.
Wiley defines this state as completion of the submission process with an acceptance decision.
For authors, this is the major scientific milestone—but publication is not yet complete.
After acceptance, the manuscript still moves through production preparation.
The editorial office may check whether submitted files satisfy production requirements before transferring the article to Wiley’s production team.
8. Accepted, Under Review for Production
Accepted, Under Review for Production means the manuscript has been accepted but is undergoing additional checks before production.
Wiley notes that additional updates may still be requested at this stage.
This is not renewed scientific peer review in the ordinary sense.
Possible issues can involve production-ready files or information required to process the accepted article.
Authors should monitor email carefully because action may be required.
9. Accepted, Updates Requested
This status means that the manuscript is accepted, but updates are needed before publication can proceed.
Wiley explicitly distinguishes this state from straightforward acceptance.
Do not ignore these requests because production can be delayed until the necessary material is supplied.
What Happens After Acceptance?
Once an accepted manuscript clears the editorial-office file checks, it proceeds to Wiley production.
According to Wiley’s production guidance, the responsible corresponding author may need to:
- Sign the publication license
- Review and approve proofs
- Complete open-access-related actions or payments where applicable
After the necessary production tasks are completed, the final typeset article is published online with a DOI. Wiley notes that articles using its Early View model can first appear online before being allocated to a particular journal issue.
10. Withdrawn
Withdrawn means that the manuscript has been removed from consideration, either by the author or on the author’s behalf.
Wiley notes that once a manuscript is withdrawn, authors normally cannot take further action on that submission through Wiley Authors.
If you did not request withdrawal and the status unexpectedly changes to Withdrawn, contact the editorial office.
Do not create a duplicate submission unless the journal advises you to do so.
11. Replaced
Replaced is mainly an administrative status.
Wiley explains that the manuscript has been replaced by a newer submission through administrative action and is no longer the active record. The submission card should point to the active replacement.
This status should not be interpreted as a scientific decision.
What Does “With Editor” Mean If You See It?
Some authors may encounter With Editor in older systems, correspondence, or discussions about journal tracking.
Conceptually, it means that an editor is handling or assessing the manuscript. However, you should not assume that this wording is part of the current standard author-facing Wiley Authors status list.
In the current Wiley system, much of this work may simply fall under Under Review, which explicitly includes editorial assessment.
What Does “Decision in Process” Mean?
This phrase is commonly discussed in relation to manuscript-tracking systems, but it is not one of the principal states in Wiley’s current published Wiley Authors status table.
Conceptually, if your journal interface displays similar wording, it generally suggests that the editor is considering the available information and preparing a decision.
It does not reliably indicate whether that decision will be acceptance, revision, or rejection.
Trying to predict outcomes from a short-lived status change is rarely useful.
What Does “Required Reviews Completed” Mean?
Likewise, this is terminology commonly associated with some editorial systems rather than one of the main current Wiley Authors statuses described by Wiley.
Where used, it typically means that the number of reviewer reports required by the editorial system has been received.
However, receiving reports is not the same as reaching a decision.
The editor may still:
- Read and compare the reports
- Request another review
- Resolve contradictory recommendations
- Evaluate the manuscript independently
- Consult another editor
- Prepare a revision or rejection decision
For Advanced Materials, the editor—not the reviewer-count indicator—determines the outcome.
Typical Status Sequence for an Advanced Materials Submission
A simplified current pathway may look like:
Draft → Submitted → In Screening → Under Review → In Revision → Under Review → Accepted
A rejected manuscript might follow:
Submitted → In Screening → Under Review → Rejected
A manuscript that receives a revision could experience repeated cycles:
Under Review → In Revision → Under Review → In Revision → Under Review → Accepted
There is no rule requiring every paper to follow exactly the same sequence.
Some manuscripts may move rapidly through stages, while others require multiple rounds of evaluation.
Three Practical Manuscript-Status Examples
Example 1: Submitted → In Screening → Under Review
Situation
A researcher submits a new Advanced Materials manuscript. Two days later the manuscript moves from Submitted to In Screening and then to Under Review.
Common interpretation
“The reviewers must already have received my paper.”
Better interpretation
The manuscript has progressed beyond initial screening, but Wiley’s definition of Under Review includes editorial review and potential external peer review.
The manuscript may still be undergoing editorial assessment or reviewer-selection activity.
Best action
Wait for official communication rather than trying to infer hidden editorial events.
Example 2: Under Review for Several Weeks
Situation
A manuscript remains Under Review for an extended period.
Common interpretation
“The delay probably means the reviews are negative.”
Better interpretation
Timing alone gives you little information about the outcome. Reviewer availability is one of the factors Wiley specifically identifies as influencing the duration of this stage.
One reviewer may have responded quickly while another declined, requested more time, or has not submitted a report.
Best action
Avoid repeated status checking. If the period becomes substantially longer than expected and there has been no communication, a courteous query to the editorial office may be appropriate.
Example 3: In Revision → Under Review
Situation
The authors submit a detailed revision, and the status returns to Under Review.
Common interpretation
“The editor was not satisfied and has restarted the whole process.”
Better interpretation
Returning to Under Review after revision is normal. The editor may reassess the response directly or send the revised paper back to reviewers.
Advanced Materials reviewer guidance notes that reviewers may be asked to evaluate revised manuscripts.
Best action
Wait for the next editorial decision unless additional information is requested.
How Long Does Each Advanced Materials Manuscript Status Last?
There is no reliable universal duration for each manuscript stage.
The time required depends on:
- Manuscript complexity
- Editorial workload
- Topic specialization
- Reviewer availability
- Number of reviewer invitations required
- Reviewer response times
- Number of reviews required
- Whether reports conflict
- Whether additional expertise is needed
- Revision complexity
- Author response time
Wiley itself notes that the timing of Under Review can be influenced by factors including reviewer availability.
For that reason, authors should be cautious with unofficial claims such as:
- “Under Review for more than 20 days means rejection.”
- “A decision within three days means desk rejection.”
- “A status that changes twice in one day means acceptance.”
- “Long review means the editor likes the manuscript.”
None of these interpretations is dependable.
When Should You Contact the Advanced Materials Editorial Office?
Contacting the journal is reasonable when you have a genuine editorial or submission question—not simply because a status has remained unchanged for a few days.
Wiley specifically advises authors to contact the journal’s editorial office if they have questions about the review status of a manuscript.
Consider contacting the editorial office when:
- A status appears abnormal for an unusually long period
- The journal has exceeded a communicated timeline substantially
- You have not received an expected decision or request
- A technical problem may have affected your submission
- You need to report important information affecting the manuscript
- You believe a revision or file was not received correctly
- You need to request withdrawal
- An unexpected administrative status appears
Avoid sending repeated messages every few days.
A professional enquiry should include:
- Manuscript ID
- Manuscript title
- Corresponding author’s name
- Submission or revision date
- Current status
- A short, polite request for clarification
Common Mistakes When Interpreting Advanced Materials Statuses
Mistake 1: Assuming Under Review Always Means External Review
This is probably the most important misunderstanding.
Wiley explicitly states that Under Review covers editorial review as well as potential external peer review.
Better approach: Treat it as a broad evaluation stage.
Mistake 2: Predicting Acceptance From Status Duration
A long or short status duration cannot reliably predict the outcome.
Better approach: Wait for the decision letter.
Mistake 3: Comparing Your Timeline With Someone Else’s
Two manuscripts submitted to the same journal can have completely different timelines.
Better approach: Compare only cautiously, especially when topics require different specialist reviewers.
Mistake 4: Treating Reviewer Recommendations as Final Decisions
Reviewers advise; editors decide.
Advanced Materials makes clear that the final decision is made by the responsible editor and may not always match reviewer recommendations.
Mistake 5: Believing Revision Equals Acceptance
A revision invitation means the manuscript remains under consideration.
Better approach: Treat every reviewer and editor comment seriously.
Mistake 6: Using Old Status Guides as Current Wiley Policy
Submission platforms evolve.
Better approach: Use your current Wiley Authors dashboard and Wiley’s current Help Center terminology.
Mistake 7: Sending an Unpolished Revision
A revision is a new opportunity for evaluation, not simply an administrative exercise.
Check the manuscript, response letter, figures, references, and consistency before resubmission.
Manuscript Revision Checklist
Before resubmitting a revision to Advanced Materials, check that:
- Every editor comment has been addressed
- Every reviewer comment has been answered
- Changes are clearly identified
- Disagreements are explained respectfully and scientifically
- New experiments are accurately described
- New claims are supported
- Figures and tables match the revised text
- References added during revision are relevant
- The abstract reflects important manuscript changes
- Conclusions remain consistent with the evidence
- The response letter is easy to follow
- Journal formatting and file requirements have been rechecked
- Language and grammar have been reviewed
- All authors have approved the revised version
How to Check Your Manuscript Status in Wiley Authors
Wiley advises authors to use the Wiley Authors dashboard to track manuscripts through peer review and production.
The process is straightforward:
- Log into Wiley Authors.
- Find the manuscript using its title, journal name, manuscript ID, or DOI where relevant.
- Look beneath the article title for the displayed status.
- Check email for editorial decisions and required actions.
The dashboard can also support revision uploads and later post-acceptance activities.
Do not rely solely on repeatedly refreshing the status page. The decision letter contains far more useful information than a short system label.
What Should You Work on While the Manuscript Is Under Review?
Waiting does not have to mean doing nothing.
Researchers can use the review period productively to:
- Organize underlying research data
- Review references for accuracy
- Prepare supplementary documentation
- Continue related experiments where scientifically appropriate
- Prepare for possible reviewer questions
- Check figures and source files
- Review journal policies
- Consider how additional analyses might strengthen the work
- Keep co-authors informed
- Work on another research project
However, avoid making speculative revisions solely because you are anxious about the manuscript status. Wait for the editor’s actual feedback before restructuring a submitted manuscript.
How Contentxprtz Can Support Researchers During Submission and Revision
Manuscript-status uncertainty often becomes most important when the journal requests a revision. At that point, researchers may need to address complex reviewer comments while maintaining scientific accuracy, consistency, and clarity.
Contentxprtz provides academic editing and research communication support for researchers, students, authors, and institutions and describes its services as focusing on manuscripts, research papers, theses, dissertations, and other academic documents.
For researchers preparing an Advanced Materials submission or revision, relevant support may include:
- Language and clarity editing
- Manuscript structure review
- Consistency checking
- Response-to-reviewer editing
- Journal-specific presentation review
- Reference and formatting checks
- Final proofreading
Researchers who need detailed manuscript-language support can explore the Contentxprtz research paper editing service.
Professional editing should improve presentation and communication while preserving the researcher’s intellectual contribution. Authors remain responsible for their scientific claims, data, methodology, references, interpretation, and final submission.
Summary: What Are the Different Statuses for a Manuscript Submitted to Advanced Materials?
The current Wiley Authors workflow uses broad manuscript states rather than exposing every internal editorial action.
The most important statuses are:
Submitted: The manuscript has successfully entered the journal’s system.
In Screening: Preliminary checks are being performed.
Under Review: The manuscript has passed initial screening and may be undergoing editorial assessment, reviewer selection, or external peer review.
In Revision: The editor has invited the authors to revise the manuscript.
Rejected: The editorial process has ended with rejection.
Accepted: The paper has received an acceptance decision.
Accepted, Under Review for Production / Accepted, Updates Requested: The scientific decision is positive, but production-related checks or updates remain.
The most important caution is that Under Review does not necessarily mean external peer review is already underway. Wiley specifically defines the status broadly enough to cover editorial review and potential external peer review.
Similarly, the length of time a manuscript stays in a particular status should not be treated as a reliable indicator of the final decision.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What are the different statuses for a manuscript submitted to the journal Advanced Materials?
The principal current Wiley Authors statuses include Submitted, In Screening, Under Review, In Revision, Accepted, Rejected, Withdrawn, and Replaced, along with post-acceptance states such as Accepted, Under Review for Production and Accepted, Updates Requested.
The exact status visible on your dashboard tells you the operational stage of the submission, but it does not usually reveal every internal activity. In particular, Under Review can include editorial assessment and potential external peer review.
Therefore, authors should rely on the official decision letter for meaningful information about the editor’s assessment rather than trying to infer outcomes from status wording alone.
2. Does Under Review at Advanced Materials mean reviewers have accepted the manuscript?
No. Under Review does not mean that the manuscript has been accepted or that external reviewers have necessarily started reviewing it.
Wiley defines Under Review broadly: the manuscript has passed initial screening and may be assigned to an editor, and the stage can cover editorial review as well as potential external peer review.
If the manuscript later receives external reports, the editor will evaluate them and issue an appropriate decision.
3. Is moving from In Screening to Under Review a good sign?
It means the manuscript has progressed beyond initial screening, which is a genuine step forward in the workflow.
However, it should not be interpreted as evidence of eventual acceptance. Because Wiley’s Under Review category includes editorial review, the manuscript may still be undergoing an editor’s evaluation before or alongside reviewer-related activity.
The safest interpretation is simply that the manuscript remains under active consideration.
4. How long can an Advanced Materials manuscript remain Under Review?
There is no universal duration that applies to every manuscript.
Reviewer availability, subject specialization, editor workload, declined invitations, delayed reports, conflicting reviewer recommendations, and requests for additional expertise can all affect timing. Wiley explicitly identifies reviewer availability as one factor influencing the length of the Under Review stage.
Avoid assuming that a long review indicates rejection or that a fast review indicates acceptance.
5. What does In Revision mean in Advanced Materials?
In Revision means the editor has asked the authors to revise the manuscript before another decision is made.
The revision may involve relatively limited amendments or substantial scientific and textual changes. Advanced Materials reviewers can recommend publication after minor revision or reconsideration after major revision, depending on the issues identified.
Authors should respond to every substantive comment clearly and provide a well-structured point-by-point response.
6. Does major revision mean my Advanced Materials paper is likely to be accepted?
A major revision is an opportunity to continue the publication process, but it is not an acceptance guarantee.
The manuscript may be reassessed by the editor, returned to reviewers, or sent for additional review. The revised version can still be rejected if major concerns remain unresolved.
Treat the decision as an invitation to strengthen the manuscript rather than as a formality.
7. What happens after a manuscript is accepted by Advanced Materials?
After acceptance, the editorial office checks whether the manuscript files meet production requirements before the material is transferred to Wiley’s production team.
The responsible corresponding author may then need to complete publication-license requirements, review proofs, and handle open-access-related tasks where relevant.
After required production steps are complete, Wiley publishes the final typeset article online with a DOI.
8. Should I email Advanced Materials if my status has not changed?
Not simply because the status has remained unchanged for a short period.
Editorial and peer-review processes can take time, particularly when specialist reviewers must be identified. If the manuscript has remained unchanged for an unusually long period, or if the journal has passed a communicated timeline substantially, a polite enquiry may be appropriate.
Wiley directs authors with questions about the review status of a manuscript to the relevant journal editorial office.
9. Can I tell whether my Advanced Materials manuscript will be accepted from the status?
No. Manuscript-status labels are poor predictors of editorial decisions.
Terms such as Under Review primarily tell you where the manuscript is in the workflow. They do not reveal reviewer recommendations or the editor’s eventual conclusion.
Even reviewer recommendations are advisory. Advanced Materials states that the responsible editor makes the final decision and may not always follow every reviewer recommendation.
Wait for the formal decision letter before drawing conclusions.
10. When might professional editing help during the Advanced Materials submission process?
Professional editing can be useful before initial submission or after a revision request when the science is sound but clarity, organization, language, consistency, or the reviewer-response document needs improvement.
Editing should not change data or fabricate arguments. The researcher must remain responsible for the intellectual and scientific content.
For authors preparing a revision, a specialist research paper editing service can help improve language, structure, and response clarity while preserving the author’s research contribution.
About the Author
Dr. Aanya Mehta
Research Writer & Professional Business Communicator
Dr. Aanya Mehta is a research-oriented writer and professional communicator with a strong focus on accuracy, clarity, and evidence-based insight. Her work combines analytical thinking with accessible writing, helping readers understand complex business topics through well-researched, credible, and practical content.
Conclusion
Understanding Advanced Materials manuscript statuses is useful because it helps researchers separate actual editorial information from speculation.
A manuscript begins with submission and screening, may then move into a broad Under Review stage, and can subsequently receive a revision request, rejection, or acceptance. The most important nuance is that Wiley’s current Under Review status can encompass both editorial review and potential external peer review, so authors should not automatically assume that referees are already evaluating the manuscript.
If revision is requested, focus less on interpreting the status and more on the editor’s and reviewers’ written comments. A careful response, scientifically justified revisions, clear language, and consistent presentation are far more valuable than trying to predict the outcome from dashboard changes.
After acceptance, authors should continue monitoring Wiley Authors and email because file checks, proofs, licensing, and other production activities may still require action before publication.
When your paper is already scientifically strong but needs a clearer presentation or a polished response to reviewers, appropriate academic editing can help improve communication without replacing your intellectual contribution.
“At Contentxprtz, we don’t just edit; we help ideas reach their fullest potential.”
