Tourism Review: Scopus Indexing, Metrics, Scope and Submission Guide

Quick Answer: What Is Tourism Review?

Tourism Review (TR) is an international scholarly journal focused on tourism research and published by Emerald Publishing. Its official scope includes original, creative, multi- and interdisciplinary work on tourism systems, destinations, markets, management, policy, sustainability, technology, hospitality and related social, economic and environmental questions.

The journal is indexed and ranked in Scopus; the task source identifies Scopus Source ID 21100248909, and Emerald currently displays Scopus-derived CiteScore metrics on the journal page. Emerald also lists Tourism Review in the Social Sciences Citation Index. The journal uses double-anonymous peer review and, for suitable submissions, sends manuscripts to at least two independent referees.

Researchers considering Tourism Review should review recent papers, the current aims and scope, the exact article classification, and the latest author instructions before submission. The official guidelines contain an important word-count inconsistency: a general 6,000–8,000-word range appears alongside category descriptions that specify maxima of 5,500 words for research papers and cutting-edge research. Authors should therefore verify the limit that applies to their selected article type in ScholarOne or with the journal office.

Key Takeaways

• Publisher: Emerald Publishing; Tourism Review has published tourism research since 1946.
• Identifiers: ISSN 1660-5373, eISSN 1759-8451, Scopus Source ID 21100248909.
• Current metrics shown by Emerald: 2025 CiteScore 18.8; 2025 Journal Impact Factor 7.9; 5-year Impact Factor 7.6.
• Peer review: double anonymous; suitable manuscripts go to at least two independent referees.
• Article types: research papers, cutting-edge research, perspective papers and research innovations.
• Open access: hybrid model; authors can choose gold OA after acceptance or use Emerald’s green self-archiving route.
• 2026 hybrid gold OA APC: Emerald states a standard hybrid-journal APC of £3,222 / US$4,351 / €3,710, plus VAT where applicable; authors should check eligibility, agreements and the current invoice amount.
• Selectivity: Emerald reports a 7.6% acceptance rate for submissions from 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025.

Journal Information at a Glance

The table below separates verified current facts from fields that should be reconfirmed in the relevant database.

What This Page Covers

• Tourism Review aims, scope and subject coverage
• Scopus identification, indexing and current citation metrics
• Article types and manuscript-format requirements
• Submission workflow and double-anonymous peer review
• Open-access choices, publication charges and self-archiving
• Publication ethics, authorship, originality and AI-use rules
• A practical journal-fit checklist for researchers and PhD scholars
• Ethical manuscript-preparation support from Contentxprtz

Methodology and Sources

This profile was prepared from the supplied Scopus source identifiers and the current official Tourism Review pages from Emerald Publishing, together with the ISSN Portal record for publication identifiers and frequency. Current metrics, editorial leadership, peer-review details, author instructions, open-access policy and publication timelines were checked against Emerald. Because citation metrics, APCs, editorial teams and indexing records can change, authors should reconfirm time-sensitive information before submission or institutional reporting.

Useful authoritative starting points are the official Tourism Review journal page, the Scopus source profile, the journal’s ScholarOne submission system, Emerald’s open-access and APC information, and Emerald’s publishing-ethics guidance.

Tourism Review Aims and Scope

Tourism Review aims to advance understanding of tourism and strengthen the relevance of tourism research to global society. Its official scope is deliberately broad and multidisciplinary, covering the tourism ecosystem from travellers and communities to destinations, firms, technologies, public policy and environmental consequences.

Emerald lists themes including the meaning of tourism and its stakeholders; tourism business environments; management and strategy; demand, markets and consumer behaviour; co-created experiences; tourism policy and governance; planning and regional development; destination competitiveness; marketing and branding; ICT, social media and reputation; distribution and intermediation; economic, socio-cultural and environmental impacts; sustainability and climate change; tourism geography and mobility; hospitality, transport, attractions, festivals and leisure; sports and events; and gastronomy and food tourism.

For researchers evaluating fit, the practical implication is that Tourism Review can accommodate theoretical, empirical, conceptual and methodological work across many tourism subfields. However, a paper should still show why the problem matters to tourism scholarship rather than merely using a tourism setting. A generic marketing, technology or management study with tourism respondents but little tourism-specific contribution may struggle at editorial screening.

Topics that may fit well

• tourist behaviour, demand, segmentation and experience design
• destination management, competitiveness, branding and governance
• sustainable, regenerative, rural, urban, coastal or mountain tourism
• digital tourism, smart ecosystems, platforms, social media and reputation
• hospitality, transport, attractions, festivals, events and sports tourism
• tourism policy, community impacts, inclusion, mobility and economic integration
• systematic reviews, conceptual advances and innovative tourism methodologies

As a publication-readiness step, compare the manuscript with several recent Tourism Review papers that use similar theory, data and methods. That comparison is not a formal journal requirement, but it is one of the most useful ways to judge whether the contribution is sufficiently tourism-specific and aligned with the journal’s current conversation.

Scopus Indexing, Web of Science and Current Metrics

Tourism Review is associated with Scopus Source ID 21100248909. Emerald’s indexing and metrics section presents a Scopus-derived 2025 CiteScore of 18.8 and identifies Scopus among the journal’s ranking services. Emerald also lists the journal in the Social Sciences Citation Index from Clarivate.

What about Q1, SJR and SNIP? These values can change by reporting year and category. Because a directly accessible live Scopus source record was not available during preparation, this guide does not reproduce a current quartile, SJR or SNIP from third-party metric sites. Researchers who need these figures for university or PhD rules should open the Scopus source profile and record the metric year, category and percentile shown there.

Article Types Published by Tourism Review

The official author instructions currently list four submission classifications: research papers, cutting-edge research, perspective papers and research innovations.

Emerald’s same author-guideline page also gives a general article-length range of 6,000–8,000 words, including the structured abstract, references, tables, figures and appendices, with an allowance of 350 words for each figure or table. Because this conflicts with the 5,500-word maxima in the category descriptions, authors should not guess which number prevails. Confirm the applicable limit in the current ScholarOne workflow or ask the journal office before final formatting.

Manuscript Requirements and Formatting

Tourism Review requires authors to follow Emerald’s manuscript preparation instructions closely. Article files should be supplied in Microsoft Word; a PDF may accompany the Word file but a PDF alone is not acceptable. LaTeX is permitted only with an accompanying PDF.

All submissions need a structured abstract with the mandatory headings Purpose, Design/methodology/approach, Findings and Originality. Research limitations/implications, Practical implications and Social implications are optional where relevant. The maximum abstract length is 250 words in total, including keywords and article classification, and authors may supply up to 12 short keywords.

References must use a recognised Harvard style; Emerald provides its own Harvard examples and asks authors to include a DOI at the end of a reference where one is available. Figures should be high quality, clearly numbered and captioned, with appropriate credit lines for third-party material.

Submission Process and Peer Review

Submissions are made by the corresponding author through ScholarOne Manuscripts as linked from the official Emerald page. Emerald explicitly states that authors should submit directly through the journal’s system, not by email and not through a third-party proxy acting on their behalf.

After submission, the editor performs an initial check. A manuscript may be declined or returned without external review if it does not fit the aims and scope or if the language or manuscript quality is too low. If the editor considers it potentially suitable, Tourism Review sends the paper to at least two independent referees under a double-anonymous model. The editor may then accept, request minor or major revisions, or decline the manuscript.

Emerald’s generic process statement says the goal is to communicate a first decision within 60 days, while the journal’s metric panel currently reports an average 12 days to first decision based on submissions from 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025. These are not promises for an individual paper. Emerald also reports an average 51 days from acceptance to publication, last updated April 2025.

Acceptance Rate and What It Means for Authors

Emerald reports a Tourism Review acceptance rate of 7.6% for manuscripts submitted between 1 April 2024 and 31 March 2025. Because the figure is publisher-reported and date-bounded, it is more useful than an estimated or crowd-sourced acceptance rate, but it still should not be treated as a personal probability of acceptance.

For an author, the number signals selectivity. A manuscript is more likely to survive editorial screening when it does four things clearly: establishes a tourism-specific research problem, demonstrates a meaningful contribution beyond existing literature, uses a defensible method or conceptual approach, and follows the journal’s article-type and presentation requirements. Strong language editing can help reviewers understand the work, but it cannot compensate for a weak research question, inadequate evidence or poor fit.

Open Access, APCs and Copyright Options

Tourism Review operates as a hybrid journal. Authors can publish through the normal subscription route or choose gold open access after acceptance. Under gold OA, Emerald states that the article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 licence.

For 2026, Emerald states a standard hybrid-journal APC of £3,222 / US$4,351 / €3,710, plus VAT where applicable. The amount may be affected by institutional agreements, vouchers, funding arrangements or future price changes, so authors should verify the amount shown in the editorial system before committing to gold OA.

Emerald also offers a green open-access route: after publication, authors can make the accepted manuscript openly available without an embargo under the publisher’s stated self-archiving policy. Authors who do not select gold OA should not be charged a submission or publication fee merely for the standard route; Emerald says the journal requests payment only when gold OA is chosen.

Research Ethics, Authorship and AI Use

Tourism Review follows Emerald’s research and publishing ethics framework and the publisher states that it closely follows COPE guidance. Submissions should be original, not simultaneously under consideration elsewhere, and should disclose conflicts of interest and any substantial previously published material. Third-party copyrighted material requires appropriate permission before publication.

Authorship must reflect substantial and meaningful contribution. Large language models cannot be credited as authors because they cannot take responsibility for the integrity of the work. Emerald’s current AI policy is particularly important for researchers using generative tools: generative-AI copywriting that creates new submission text is not permitted, while copy-editing an author’s own original work to improve structure, clarity, language and grammar is permitted subject to responsible and transparent use. Authors should read the current policy before using any AI-assisted workflow.

If the research involves human participants, authors should determine whether ethical approval and informed consent are required and include relevant information in the submission. Emerald also encourages transparent citation of data, code and methods under the Transparency and Openness Promotion principles.

Who Should Consider Submitting to Tourism Review?

Tourism Review may suit researchers whose work makes a substantial tourism contribution and speaks to an international audience. Potential contributors include established academics, early-career researchers, PhD scholars, interdisciplinary teams and professionals conducting rigorous tourism research.

A PhD-derived manuscript can be suitable, especially because the journal explicitly includes a research-innovations category for short work on PhD research or innovative methods. However, being based on a thesis does not itself make the paper suitable. The article still needs a focused standalone contribution, journal-relevant framing and compliance with the selected article type.

A practical journal-fit test

1. Scope: Is tourism central to the research question and contribution?
2. Novelty: Can you state what the paper changes, extends or challenges in the tourism literature?
3. Audience: Would the finding matter beyond one local case or organisation?
4. Method: Is the design rigorous enough for the claims being made?
5. Article type: Does the manuscript clearly match one of the journal’s listed classifications?
6. Recent conversation: Do recent Tourism Review articles show that your topic and approach are part of the journal’s scholarly dialogue?

If the answer to several of these questions is no, revise the manuscript positioning or consider another journal before investing time in detailed formatting.

Common Reasons a Manuscript May Be Unsuitable

Emerald states that the editor can decline manuscripts at initial assessment for poor scope fit or inadequate language/manuscript quality. Beyond those explicit reasons, authors should also watch for broader publication-readiness problems that commonly undermine journal fit.

• Tourism is merely the setting and the contribution is generic to another discipline.
• The research question repeats a heavily studied relationship without a compelling new theoretical or practical contribution.
• The method does not support the causal, generalisable or policy claims made.
• A systematic review is descriptive rather than conceptually advancing the field or building a future agenda.
• The manuscript is submitted under the wrong classification or ignores article-specific length and reference limits.
• The paper reveals author identity despite double-anonymous review requirements.
• References, permissions, ethics statements, funding acknowledgements or conflicts are incomplete.

How to Prepare a Stronger Tourism Review Submission

As a practical publication-readiness step, begin with fit rather than formatting. Write a one-sentence statement of the tourism problem, one sentence explaining the gap, and one sentence stating the contribution. If those sentences are vague, additional polishing will not solve the underlying positioning issue.

Next, examine recent Tourism Review articles closest to your topic. Look at how they frame tourism relevance, how much theory they develop, how methods are reported, and how implications are connected to global society, destinations, stakeholders or policy. Use this reading to refine—not imitate—your manuscript structure and contribution.

Before submission, check the structured abstract against the main paper, ensure claims match the evidence, remove identifying details from the review manuscript, verify Harvard-style references and DOI data, and confirm the current word limit for the chosen classification. For ESL authors, professional academic editing can improve clarity, sentence structure, terminology and consistency, but editorial decisions remain with the journal.

How Contentxprtz Can Support Publication Readiness

Preparing for Tourism Review involves more than correcting grammar. Authors need to establish scope fit, communicate the contribution clearly, follow Emerald’s author instructions, maintain consistent academic language, present tables and figures effectively, and satisfy ethical and reference requirements.

Contentxprtz can ethically support an author’s own research through journal publication services, manuscript assessment, academic editing, proofreading, journal formatting, reference and citation checking, cover-letter editing, reviewer-response editing and publication-readiness review. Support should preserve the author’s intellectual ownership and must comply with the journal’s current policy on AI-assisted writing and editing.

Contentxprtz does not control editorial decisions and does not guarantee acceptance or publication. The purpose of support is to help researchers present their own work clearly, accurately, ethically and in alignment with applicable journal requirements.

Summary: Tourism Review

Tourism Review is an Emerald Publishing journal with a wide multidisciplinary scope across tourism management, markets, destinations, policy, sustainability, technology, hospitality and related fields. The supplied Scopus identifier is 21100248909; Emerald currently reports a 2025 CiteScore of 18.8 and a 2025 Journal Impact Factor of 7.9, and lists the journal in the Social Sciences Citation Index.

The journal uses double-anonymous peer review and sends suitable submissions to at least two independent referees. It offers research papers, cutting-edge research, perspective papers and research innovations, with article-specific instructions that authors should verify carefully because the current page contains conflicting general and category-specific word-count statements. Tourism Review is hybrid: gold open access is optional after acceptance, while green self-archiving is also available.

For a prospective author, the best decision process is straightforward: verify current metrics and policies, assess real scope fit using recent articles, select the correct manuscript type, prepare the paper to the official instructions, and submit directly through ScholarOne. Professional support can improve clarity and readiness, but no editing or submission service can guarantee journal acceptance.