Journal Patriot: What Researchers Should Know About Jurnal Patriot

Jurnal Patriot is a scholarly journal focused on sports coaching and related sports-science areas. Its official site identifies Universitas Negeri Padang Press as the publisher and lists scientific research articles and review papers in sports coaching education as its core content. The journal began in 2018 and currently describes a quarterly schedule, with issues planned for March, June, September, and December. Its scope includes coaching science, sports management, philosophy of sports, pedagogy, sports physiology, sports biomechanics, sports psychology, and sports sociology. If you searched for “journal patriot,” verify that you are looking at the official Jurnal Patriot site rather than a different publication with a similar name. Before submitting, compare your manuscript’s research question, population, methods, and contribution with recently published articles and the journal’s current author guidelines. A name match is not enough; topical fit and compliance with the journal’s instructions are central to a credible submission.

Yes. The official Jurnal Patriot site states that published articles undergo double-blind peer review, beginning with editorial screening and followed by anonymous refereeing. Double-blind review generally means that author and reviewer identities are concealed from each other during the review process, although the exact workflow is determined by the journal. Researchers should still distinguish peer review from guaranteed acceptance: an editor can reject a manuscript before external review when the topic is outside scope, the article does not meet minimum scholarly standards, or the formatting and submission requirements are not followed. A strong submission therefore needs more than correct language. It should present a clear research problem, appropriate methods, transparent results, a defensible discussion, accurate references, and a contribution that fits the journal. Before submission, remove identifying information where required by the journal’s blind-review process and check the current instructions because editorial workflows can change.

Jurnal Patriot’s official focus and scope centers on the development of sports coaching science. The journal lists coaching science, sports management, philosophy of sports, pedagogy, sports physiology, sports biomechanics, sports psychology, sports sociology, and related physical-education pedagogy. This means a manuscript should have a meaningful connection to sport, coaching, athlete development, physical education, performance, management, or a closely related scholarly question. A paper can use methods from psychology, physiology, education, sociology, or biomechanics, but the contribution should still make sense for the journal’s sports-focused readership. Authors should not rely on a broad keyword such as “education” or “management” alone. Read several recent papers, inspect the types of participants and research designs the journal publishes, and compare your manuscript’s objectives with the stated scope. If the connection is weak, a journal with a more direct disciplinary audience may provide a better editorial and readership fit.

Jurnal Patriot has several verifiable discovery and identifier signals. The ISSN Portal lists the online ISSN 2714-6596 and print ISSN 2655-4984. DOAJ has a record for Jurnal Patriot and describes it as an open-access journal published by Universitas Negeri Padang. The journal’s official site also states that it uses Crossref DOI infrastructure and mentions Google Scholar, Sinta, and Garuda for citation or discovery. These signals can help authors verify journal identity, but indexing should be checked directly in each database at the time you make a submission decision because database coverage and status can change. Do not infer Scopus or Web of Science coverage merely from the word “indexed” on a third-party page. If a particular index matters for graduation, funding, promotion, or institutional reporting, search that index directly and keep evidence of the journal record you relied on.

DOAJ’s journal record reports an article-processing charge of up to IDR 300,000 and states that no waiver policy is listed there. Fees can change, so authors should confirm the current amount and payment conditions on the journal’s own site or submission system before submitting or paying. A legitimate fee should be transparent, connected to the journal’s stated publication process, and never presented as a payment that guarantees acceptance. Editorial decisions should depend on scholarly assessment and peer review rather than payment. Researchers should also check who issues the payment request, whether the destination matches official journal information, and whether any invoice or instruction appears inside the authorized submission workflow. If the journal’s current site conflicts with an older directory record, treat the official current journal information as the primary operational source and contact the editorial office through the journal’s listed contact route for clarification.

Start by reading Jurnal Patriot’s current author guidelines and examining recent articles in the section most similar to your study. Then align the manuscript with the journal’s required structure, formatting, language, reference style, tables, figures, and file requirements. For an empirical sports-science paper, the manuscript should normally communicate a clear research question, sufficient methodological detail, transparent results, and a discussion that explains the contribution without overstating what the data prove. Check author names, affiliations, ethics approval where applicable, participant-consent statements, funding, conflicts of interest, and data or materials information when required. Verify every reference against its source and ensure tables and figures are numbered and cited in the text. Professional journal manuscript editing can improve language, organization, consistency, and presentation, but the authors remain responsible for the research, data, interpretation, citations, and final submission. Complete a final journal-specific check after editing because generic academic formatting may not match Jurnal Patriot’s current requirements.

No. Ethical academic editing or publication support cannot guarantee acceptance in Jurnal Patriot or any legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Editorial outcomes depend on factors such as journal scope, research quality, methodological rigor, novelty, clarity, ethical compliance, reviewer comments, competing submissions, and the editor’s judgment. A service can help an author reduce avoidable presentation problems by improving language, structure, consistency, references, formatting, response-to-reviewer clarity, and alignment with author instructions. It can also help an author identify questions that should be resolved before submission. However, it should not invent data, alter results to make them more attractive, fabricate citations, write false ethics statements, or promise a publication outcome. The most useful goal is a manuscript that communicates the authors’ genuine work accurately and professionally. Authors should make the final scientific decisions and approve every change before submission.

Use a journal-specific pre-submission checklist. Confirm first that the paper fits Jurnal Patriot’s sports-coaching scope and that the manuscript type is accepted. Then compare the title, abstract, keywords, section order, reference style, tables, figures, and supplementary files with the current author guidelines. Check that all authors qualify for authorship, have approved the final version, and agree on the corresponding author. Verify ethics approval or consent information where the research requires it, disclose funding and relevant conflicts, and make sure the manuscript is not under consideration by another journal. Recheck statistics, units, figure labels, table totals, citations, and reference metadata. Remove author-identifying information if the submission instructions require an anonymized file for double-blind review. Finally, save the exact submitted version and any confirmation messages. These checks cannot ensure acceptance, but they reduce preventable technical and ethical problems that can delay editorial assessment.

Judge fit at three levels: topic, audience, and evidence. Topic fit means the manuscript addresses sports coaching science or a closely related area within the journal’s stated scope. Audience fit means the findings would be useful to researchers, academics, practitioners, coaches, educators, or other readers who follow the journal. Evidence fit means the study design and manuscript type are appropriate for the questions being asked and comparable to work the journal publishes. Read the journal’s aims and scope, then review several recent articles rather than relying only on the title of the journal. Compare your abstract with those papers: are the problem, methods, and implications part of the same scholarly conversation? Also check practical constraints such as language, format, publication schedule, and any current fees. If an institutional requirement depends on a particular indexing database, verify that separately. A journal-selection decision should combine scholarly fit with verified publication information.

Treat AI use as something that requires human verification and compliance with the journal’s current policy. Do not list a chatbot or AI system as an author. Human authors must remain accountable for the accuracy, originality, citations, analysis, and claims in the submitted work. If AI-assisted tools were used for language, drafting, coding, images, analysis, or other tasks, check whether Jurnal Patriot requires disclosure and follow the current author instructions. Independently verify factual statements, references, quotations, statistics, and generated text because AI output can be incomplete or wrong. Never use AI to fabricate participants, data, ethics approvals, reviewer responses, or citations. ICMJE guidance, while written primarily for medical journals, provides a useful general principle: authors should disclose relevant AI use when required and remain responsible for submitted material. If language assistance is needed, ethical editing should preserve the authors’ meaning and research decisions rather than substituting invented scholarly content.