Journal of Cleaner Production: Scopus, Scope & Author Guide

Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary Elsevier journal centered on cleaner production, environmental research, and sustainability research and practice. Researchers typically consider it when a manuscript does more than describe an environmental problem: the study should make a clear contribution to prevention, resource efficiency, sustainable production or consumption, life-cycle thinking, policy, management, or another theme that fits the journal’s stated sustainability mission.

The journal is indexed in Scopus, and the supplied Scopus source record identifies Source ID 19167. The same source record identifies Elsevier as publisher and the print ISSN as 0959-6526. The current Elsevier Cleaner Production family page lists a CiteScore of 21.3 and an Impact Factor of 10.7; these are time-sensitive metrics and should be reconfirmed before institutional or PhD reporting.

This guide brings together journal identity, aims and scope, indexing, current metrics, article types, author requirements, single-anonymized peer review, open-access choices, publication ethics, journal-fit checks, and practical preparation guidance. Journal policies, fees and metrics can change, so the final pre-submission check should always be made against the current official Elsevier pages.

Journal of Cleaner Production journal profile, Scopus indexing and submission guide
Journal of Cleaner Production profile for researchers evaluating scope, indexing, metrics, submission requirements and publication readiness.

Quick Answer: What Is Journal of Cleaner Production?

Journal of Cleaner Production is an Elsevier journal for international, transdisciplinary research on cleaner production, environmental issues and sustainability. Elsevier describes its purpose as helping societies become more sustainable and frames cleaner production around preventing waste while improving efficiency in the use of energy, water, resources and human capital.

It is a current Scopus-indexed journal with print ISSN 0959-6526, online ISSN 1879-1786 and Scopus Source ID 19167. It supports both subscription publication and optional open access. Researchers should consider it when the manuscript’s central contribution clearly connects to the journal’s cleaner-production and sustainability scope rather than using sustainability only as a broad background theme.

Before submitting, confirm the latest author guide, current metrics, APC, article type, required files, ethics declarations and whether recent papers show a genuine topic and methodological fit.

Key Takeaways

  • Publisher: Elsevier; journal platform: ScienceDirect.
  • Identifiers: print ISSN 0959-6526; online ISSN 1879-1786; Scopus Source ID 19167.
  • Scope: cleaner production, environmental research, sustainability research and practice, with prevention and resource-efficiency at the core.
  • Current publisher metrics: Elsevier’s current Cleaner Production family page lists CiteScore 21.3 and Impact Factor 10.7.
  • Peer review: single-anonymized; suitable manuscripts are typically sent to at least two independent expert reviewers.
  • Article types: original articles, commissioned review articles, technical notes and letters to the editor.
  • Open access: hybrid; the ScienceDirect journal page lists an OA APC of USD 4,620 excluding taxes, while subscription publication is listed with no publication fee.
  • Preparation: original articles are normally 6,000–8,000 words, abstracts up to 250 words, 1–7 English keywords, and 3–5 highlights of up to 85 characters each.

Journal Information at a Glance

Journal of Cleaner Production verified journal information
FieldJournal information
Journal nameJournal of Cleaner Production
Source typeJournal
Scopus Source ID19167
Print ISSN0959-6526
Online ISSN1879-1786
PublisherElsevier / Elsevier Ltd.
Primary languageEnglish
Scopus statusIndexed; verify current status in Scopus before formal reporting
Current CiteScore21.3 on Elsevier’s current Cleaner Production family page
Current Impact Factor10.7 on Elsevier’s current Cleaner Production family page
SJR / SNIP2025 institutional Scopus-metric records report SJR 2.019 and SNIP 2.040; confirm in Scopus for formal use
QuartileRecent Scopus category records place the journal in Q1; category and reporting year should be stated when used
Peer reviewSingle-anonymized; typically at least two independent reviewers after editorial screening
Open accessHybrid: optional open access or subscription publication
OA APCUSD 4,620 excluding taxes on the official ScienceDirect journal page; verify current live fee
Official journal pageScienceDirect journal homepage
Scopus profileScopus Source ID 19167
Author guideGuide for Authors

Metrics can change between reporting cycles. CiteScore, Impact Factor, SJR, SNIP and quartile should therefore be cited with a year or current-source context rather than treated as permanent journal attributes.

What This Page Covers

  • Journal aims, scope and subject coverage
  • Scopus and other verified indexing information
  • Current metrics and how to interpret quartiles
  • Article types and manuscript requirements
  • Submission workflow and single-anonymized peer review
  • Open-access options, APC and publication timeline indicators
  • Publication ethics and generative-AI requirements
  • Journal-fit checks, common mismatch risks and Contentxprtz publication-readiness support

Methodology and Sources

This profile prioritizes current authoritative sources: the official ScienceDirect journal page, the official Guide for Authors, Elsevier’s Cleaner Production journal-family page, the supplied Scopus Source ID, and institutional records for Scopus SJR/SNIP context where public Scopus details are not fully accessible. Fees, metrics, editors, indexing and policies remain changeable and should be reconfirmed immediately before submission.

Journal of Cleaner Production Aims and Scope

The journal’s stated mission is to provide an international, transdisciplinary forum for cleaner production, environmental and sustainability research and practice. Its cleaner-production framing is preventive: reducing waste at source while improving efficiency in energy, water, resources and human capital. It covers theoretical and practical sustainability problems in corporations, governments, educational institutions, regions and societies.

Officially highlighted areas include cleaner production and technical processes; sustainable development and sustainability; sustainable consumption; environmental and sustainability assessment; sustainable products and services; corporate sustainability and corporate social responsibility; education for sustainable development; and governance, legislation and policy for sustainability.

Editorial interpretation matters. A manuscript can be technically strong yet still be a weak match if it reports a narrow process improvement without demonstrating a cleaner-production or sustainability contribution beyond the isolated case. The journal’s own Cleaner family description emphasizes prevention, life-cycle thinking, holistic and systematic thinking, and methodological approaches that extend beyond a single application.

Representative topics that may fit

  • Cleaner manufacturing and process redesign
  • Waste prevention, resource efficiency and industrial symbiosis
  • Life-cycle assessment and life-cycle thinking
  • Circular economy and resource loops
  • Renewable energy and industrial decarbonization
  • Sustainable supply chains and operations
  • Sustainable products, services and business models
  • Environmental performance and sustainability assessment
  • Water, energy and material efficiency
  • Pollution prevention and cleaner technologies
  • Sustainable consumption and production systems
  • Corporate sustainability and responsible management
  • Environmental governance, regulation and policy
  • Education for sustainable development
  • Regional and societal transitions toward sustainability

These examples are guidance derived from the verified scope, not an exhaustive official topic list. Authors should compare their manuscript with recent Journal of Cleaner Production papers before concluding that a topic is in scope.

Scopus Indexing and Other Major Databases

Journal of Cleaner Production is indexed in Scopus. The source record supplied with this task identifies Scopus Source ID 19167. Elsevier’s journal insights page also lists Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), while the current Elsevier Cleaner Production family page states indexing in Scopus and related journal-metric services.

For a university, PhD program, promotion dossier or funding requirement, do not rely only on a webpage saying “Scopus indexed.” Open the current Scopus source profile, confirm active coverage, and check whether your institution requires a particular category, quartile, year, or database edition.

Current Journal Metrics and Quartile

Elsevier’s current Cleaner Production family page lists CiteScore 21.3 and Impact Factor 10.7. An institutional research-portal record reporting 2025 Scopus metrics lists SJR 2.019 and SNIP 2.040. Recent category records place the journal in Q1 across its major Scopus subject categories, but quartile should always be reported with the relevant category and year.

Current and recent Journal of Cleaner Production metrics
MetricValueHow to use it responsibly
CiteScore21.3Current Elsevier family-page value; verify reporting year in Scopus for formal reporting
Impact Factor10.7Current Elsevier family-page value; confirm JCR year/category if required by your institution
SJR2.019Reported for 2025 in an institutional Scopus-metric record; verify in Scopus/SCImago
SNIP2.040Reported for 2025 in an institutional Scopus-metric record; verify in Scopus
QuartileQ1 in recent Scopus categoriesState category and year rather than saying only “the journal is Q1”

Metrics indicate citation visibility and category positioning; they do not by themselves establish whether the journal is the right intellectual audience for a particular manuscript.

Publisher and Editorial Leadership

Elsevier publishes Journal of Cleaner Production on ScienceDirect. The journal homepage currently names co-Editors-in-Chief including Cecília Maria Almeida, Maria Teresa Moreira and Yutao Wang, and provides a full editorial-board page. Editorial memberships change, so authors should use the live board page rather than reproducing a static list in a submission document.

The journal also sits within Elsevier’s Cleaner Production family of titles. A manuscript that is scientifically sound but more disciplinary or narrowly targeted may sometimes be offered transfer to a companion journal. A transfer is not acceptance; the receiving journal independently evaluates the manuscript.

Types of Articles Published

The official author guide lists the following contribution types:

Journal of Cleaner Production article types
Article typeOfficial guidance
Original articleStandard research paper, normally 6,000–8,000 words, testing hypotheses and reporting results with tables, illustrations and references as needed.
Review articleState-of-the-art review offering significant new hypotheses, comments or arguments. Reviews are commissioned by the Editors-in-Chief; unsolicited review submissions are not considered, although authors may approach the Editors-in-Chief with an innovative review idea.
Technical noteConcise scientific summary/report of approximately 3,000 words on new products or technologies relevant to cleaner production.
Letter to the EditorClarifies or responds to a published paper or raises questions about future directions or issues relevant to the journal’s mandate.

The current guide states that Conference Reports and Book Reviews are no longer published. Authors should select the article type in the submission system only after checking that their manuscript matches the live definition.

Who Should Consider Submitting?

The journal may suit PhD researchers, faculty, interdisciplinary teams, sustainability professionals and applied researchers when the manuscript makes a substantial cleaner-production or sustainability contribution for the journal’s international readership. Academic status is not the deciding factor; research fit is.

Journal-fit checklist

  • Does the main research question sit clearly within the journal’s stated cleaner-production, environmental or sustainability scope?
  • Is prevention, efficiency, life-cycle thinking, systems thinking or sustainable development central to the contribution rather than added in the conclusion?
  • Does the journal publish the proposed article type?
  • Have recent issues published related questions, methods or application contexts?
  • Is the contribution broader than one isolated local case, or does the case yield transferable theoretical, methodological or practical insight?
  • Can the manuscript explain why Journal of Cleaner Production readers need this result?
  • Can the authors meet the journal’s reporting, ethics, file and declaration requirements?
  • Have institutional Scopus, quartile or Impact Factor requirements been checked using the current reporting cycle?

Manuscript and Submission Requirements

Elsevier’s author guide requires editable source files: Word submissions should use .doc/.docx and LaTeX submissions .tex; PDF is not accepted as the source file. Word files should use a single-column layout. The title page must include a concise title, author names, affiliations and corresponding-author information.

The abstract must be concise and factual and must not exceed 250 words. Authors must provide 1–7 English keywords. The journal also requires 3–5 highlights in a separate editable file, with each bullet no longer than 85 characters including spaces. A graphical abstract is encouraged rather than universally mandatory.

Tables must remain editable, be cited in the text, numbered consecutively and accompanied by captions. Figures should be supplied as separate files, cited in the text and accompanied by captions. The guide gives resolution requirements by artwork type and asks authors to avoid low-resolution screen formats.

Reference requirements

At initial submission, the journal does not impose strict reference formatting if the chosen style is complete and consistent. The journal uses an author–year citation convention in published papers. Elsevier recommends DOI links where available and applies the journal’s final reference style at proof stage after acceptance.

Submission checklist essentials

  • Designate one corresponding author and provide complete contact details.
  • Upload all manuscript files, keywords, captions, tables and supplementary materials.
  • Check spelling and grammar.
  • Ensure every in-text citation appears in the reference list and vice versa.
  • Obtain permission for copyrighted third-party material.
  • Complete competing-interest and other required declarations.
  • Confirm that all authors approve the submission and that the manuscript is not under consideration elsewhere.

Peer-Review Process

Journal of Cleaner Production uses single-anonymized peer review. Authors’ identities are available to reviewers, while reviewer identities are not disclosed to authors. Editors first assess whether the submission is suitable for the journal. If it passes that stage, the manuscript is typically sent to at least two independent expert reviewers for scientific assessment. Editors make the final decision.

The journal’s editorial material describes topic-based handling by editors with domain expertise and notes that manuscripts may go through substantial revision. Authors should therefore treat scope alignment, methodological transparency and response-to-reviewer quality as integral parts of publication readiness.

Current journal-level timeline indicators

Elsevier’s insights page lists approximately 8 days to first decision, 61 days to a decision after review, and 145 days from submission to acceptance. These are journal-level indicators, not promises for an individual paper; reviewer availability, revision rounds, manuscript complexity and editorial workload can change the timeline.

The journal does not provide a current official acceptance rate on the live journal page. Older editorial news reported historical rejection/publishing proportions, but those figures should not be treated as the present acceptance rate.

Open Access and Publication Fees

Journal of Cleaner Production is a hybrid journal. Authors may choose open-access publication or the subscription route. The official ScienceDirect page lists an open-access APC of USD 4,620 excluding taxes; it also states that the amount may be reduced where applicable. For subscription publication, the page states that no publication fee is charged to authors and the article is available to subscribers.

APCs can change. Institutional agreements, funder arrangements or publisher eligibility rules may alter the amount an author pays. Confirm the fee and licence during the submission/acceptance workflow rather than budgeting from an old screenshot or third-party metric site.

Publication Ethics and Generative-AI Policies

The journal follows Elsevier’s publishing-ethics policies. Submission implies that the work has not been published in the same form previously except for permitted forms such as a preprint, abstract, thesis or registered report; it is not simultaneously under consideration elsewhere; and all authors and responsible authorities approve publication.

Authors must disclose relevant financial and personal competing interests. Authorship changes are controlled and generally require editor approval and agreement from affected authors. Research involving people, animals, protected data or other regulated contexts should include the applicable approvals, consent and reporting required by the study and publisher policies.

For generative AI, the current author guide requires authors to declare substantive use of AI tools in manuscript preparation in a statement before the references. Basic grammar, spelling and reference-checking tools do not require disclosure. Authors remain responsible for accuracy and integrity. Elsevier also states that reviewers and editors may not use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT in peer review or manuscript evaluation because of confidentiality and author-rights concerns. The guide also restricts generative-AI creation or alteration of manuscript images except when AI use is part of the research method and is transparently reproducible.

Common Reasons a Manuscript May Be Unsuitable

These are practical publication-readiness risks, not official rejection statistics:

  • The paper uses sustainability language but the core research question is outside cleaner production or environmental sustainability.
  • The contribution is a narrow case without transferable insight, system-level significance or clear cleaner-production relevance.
  • The manuscript does not show what is new relative to current cleaner-production or sustainability literature.
  • Methods, system boundaries, assumptions or data are insufficiently transparent to support the claims.
  • Conclusions exceed the evidence or ignore environmental, economic or social trade-offs.
  • The article type is wrong—for example, an unsolicited review is submitted despite the journal’s commissioned-review policy.
  • Required highlights, declarations, files, references or ethics information are incomplete.
  • Language or structure makes the scientific contribution difficult for an interdisciplinary audience to evaluate.

Practical Journal-Fit Examples

Example 1 — Stronger scope match

A manufacturing study compares alternative process configurations using material, energy and emissions data, explains prevention at source, quantifies trade-offs, and connects findings to scalable cleaner-production decisions. This is conceptually aligned, although novelty and methods still determine editorial interest.

Example 2 — Weak scope match

A paper reports the mechanical performance of a new material but only adds one paragraph claiming it is “sustainable” without life-cycle, resource, waste, emissions, systems or policy evidence. A materials journal may be a better match unless the sustainability contribution is genuinely developed.

Example 3 — Article-type problem

A PhD scholar prepares a systematic review and uploads it as an unsolicited review article. Because the guide states that review articles are commissioned, the author should not assume a normal unsolicited review route is available; an innovative review idea can instead be discussed with the Editors-in-Chief.

Example 4 — Good science, weak presentation

An ESL researcher has strong data but an unclear abstract, inconsistent terminology and poorly connected figures. Academic editing can improve readability and journal alignment, but it does not change the underlying evidence or guarantee that editors will send the paper for review.

Example 5 — Major revision

An author receives requests for clearer system boundaries, sensitivity analysis and moderated claims. A strong response should reproduce each reviewer point, state the action taken, identify where the manuscript changed, and give evidence-based reasons for any respectfully declined suggestion.

Pre-Submission Checklist

  • Scope checked against the live aims and scope page
  • Current Scopus status and institutional requirements verified
  • Correct article type selected
  • Original article length checked against the 6,000–8,000-word guidance where applicable
  • Abstract is no more than 250 words
  • 1–7 English keywords prepared
  • 3–5 highlights prepared, each within 85 characters including spaces
  • Editable manuscript source file prepared
  • Tables editable, numbered and captioned
  • Figures supplied separately at suitable resolution with captions
  • References complete, consistent and cross-checked; DOIs added where available
  • Competing-interest declaration completed
  • Funding, authorship and data statements included where applicable
  • Ethics approval and consent information included where required
  • Generative-AI use disclosed if required by Elsevier policy
  • All authors approve the submission
  • Open-access versus subscription route and possible APC understood
  • Cover letter explains journal fit and contribution without exaggerated claims

How Contentxprtz Can Support Journal of Cleaner Production Authors

Contentxprtz can help authors prepare a clearer, more polished and journal-aligned manuscript while all editorial and publication decisions remain solely with Journal of Cleaner Production. Support may include scope-alignment review, manuscript assessment, academic editing, ESL language polishing, title and abstract refinement, journal formatting, reference consistency, figure/table language review, cover-letter editing, submission-document checks and reviewer-response editing.

For a Journal of Cleaner Production submission, useful preparation work often includes checking whether the cleaner-production contribution is visible in the title, abstract, highlights and discussion; whether the article type matches the author guide; whether references and declarations are complete; and whether the manuscript communicates methods and sustainability implications clearly to a transdisciplinary audience.

Explore Contentxprtz journal publication services. Professional support does not guarantee journal acceptance, peer-review success or publication.

Summary: Journal of Cleaner Production

Journal of Cleaner Production is an Elsevier journal for transdisciplinary cleaner-production, environmental and sustainability research. It is indexed in Scopus under Source ID 19167 and uses print ISSN 0959-6526 and online ISSN 1879-1786. Current Elsevier information lists CiteScore 21.3 and Impact Factor 10.7. The journal publishes original articles, commissioned reviews, technical notes and letters, uses single-anonymized peer review, and supports both subscription and optional open-access publication.

For authors, the decisive question is not whether the journal is visible or highly cited, but whether the manuscript genuinely belongs in its cleaner-production and sustainability conversation. Verify the current author instructions and fees, compare the paper with recent journal content, and submit only when scope, article type, evidence, ethics and presentation are all aligned.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Journal of Cleaner Production?

Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary Elsevier journal focused on cleaner production, environmental research and sustainability research and practice. Its scope emphasizes prevention, resource efficiency and sustainable development across organizations and society.

Who publishes the Journal of Cleaner Production?

Elsevier publishes the Journal of Cleaner Production. The journal is hosted on ScienceDirect and carries print ISSN 0959-6526 and online ISSN 1879-1786.

Is the Journal of Cleaner Production indexed in Scopus?

Yes. Elsevier lists Journal of Cleaner Production as indexed in Scopus, and the supplied Scopus source record identifies Source ID 19167.

What is the current CiteScore of the Journal of Cleaner Production?

Elsevier’s current Cleaner Production journal-family page lists a CiteScore of 21.3. Journal metrics are updated periodically, so authors should confirm the value immediately before using it for institutional reporting.

What is the current Impact Factor of the Journal of Cleaner Production?

Elsevier’s current Cleaner Production journal-family page lists an Impact Factor of 10.7. Because journal metrics change by reporting cycle, researchers should verify the current value on the official journal or publisher page.

What article types does the Journal of Cleaner Production publish?

The author guide lists original articles, commissioned review articles, technical notes and letters to the editor. Original articles are normally 6,000–8,000 words; technical notes are about 3,000 words. Unsolicited review articles are not considered, although authors may contact the Editors-in-Chief with an innovative review idea.

What peer-review model does the Journal of Cleaner Production use?

The journal uses single-anonymized peer review. Editors first assess suitability; suitable manuscripts are typically sent to at least two independent expert reviewers, and editors make the final publication decision.

What is the Journal of Cleaner Production open-access model?

The journal supports both subscription publishing and optional open access, making it a hybrid journal. Elsevier’s journal page states that subscription publication has no publication fee, while an open-access APC applies when authors choose the open-access route.

What is the open-access APC for the Journal of Cleaner Production?

The official ScienceDirect journal page lists an open-access article publishing charge of USD 4,620 excluding taxes. The amount may be reduced where an agreement, discount or other eligibility applies. Authors should confirm the live fee before submission.

How long does Journal of Cleaner Production take to make a decision?

Elsevier’s journal insights page lists 8 days from submission to first decision, 61 days to a decision after review and 145 days from submission to acceptance. These are journal-level indicators rather than guarantees for an individual manuscript.

What are the abstract and keyword requirements?

The author guide requires a concise factual abstract of no more than 250 words and 1–7 keywords in English. Authors should also submit 3–5 highlights, each no more than 85 characters including spaces.

What reference style does the Journal of Cleaner Production use?

At initial submission the journal does not impose strict reference formatting, provided references are complete and consistent. Its published citation convention is author–year; Elsevier applies the journal reference style after acceptance and recommends including DOIs where available.

Does the Journal of Cleaner Production have a generative-AI policy?

Yes. Authors must disclose substantive use of generative AI or AI-assisted tools in manuscript preparation. Basic grammar, spelling and reference-checking tools do not require that declaration. Elsevier also states that reviewers and editors may not use generative AI tools for peer-review or manuscript evaluation because of confidentiality.

Is the Journal of Cleaner Production suitable for PhD researchers?

It may be suitable when a PhD manuscript clearly matches the journal’s cleaner-production, environmental or sustainability scope, meets the journal’s article-type and evidence expectations, and satisfies any university or doctoral-program indexing rules. Scopus indexing alone does not make it suitable for every PhD manuscript.

Does professional editing guarantee acceptance in the Journal of Cleaner Production?

No. Editing and publication-readiness support can improve clarity, structure, formatting and compliance, but editorial and peer-review decisions remain entirely with the journal. Contentxprtz does not guarantee acceptance or publication.

Conclusion: Evaluate Fit Before You Submit

Journal of Cleaner Production offers broad international visibility for cleaner-production and sustainability research, but breadth does not mean every environmental manuscript is a fit. Authors should make the preventive, resource-efficiency, systems, life-cycle or sustainability contribution explicit, follow the current Elsevier author instructions, and treat metrics and indexing as decision inputs rather than substitutes for scholarly fit.

For current decisions, use the official journal homepage, Guide for Authors, and Scopus source profile. Reconfirm fees, metrics, editors and policies immediately before submission.

Dr. Aanya Mehta

Research Writer & Professional Business Communicator

Dr. Aanya Mehta is a research-oriented writer and professional communicator with a strong focus on accuracy, clarity, and evidence-based insight. Her work combines analytical thinking with accessible writing, helping readers understand complex business topics through well-researched, credible, and practical content.