Tourism Management Perspectives: Scopus, Scope, Metrics & Submission Guide

Quick Answer: What Is Tourism Management Perspectives?

Tourism Management Perspectives is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal published by Elsevier and described as a companion title to Tourism Management. It publishes research that advances understanding of travel and tourism management, including how destinations and tourism organizations operate, how visitors experience and perceive places, and how tourism affects communities, economies and environments.

The journal is covered by Scopus and appears under Source ID 21100202157 in the supplied source record. Elsevier also lists Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), SNIP and the Australian Business Deans Council among its abstracting and indexing information. For a researcher whose doctoral programme or employer requires a Scopus- or Web of Science-indexed venue, this makes the journal potentially relevant, but institutional recognition rules should still be checked independently.

Before submitting, assess three things together: scope fit, contribution and compliance. A paper can be technically strong yet unsuitable if the tourism-management contribution is weak; equally, a well-matched topic can be screened out if the manuscript does not meet the journal’s reporting and submission requirements.

Key Takeaways

• Publisher: Elsevier; official journal platform is ScienceDirect.
• Scopus identity: Source ID 21100202157; print ISSN 2211-9736; online ISSN 2211-9744.
• Scope: interdisciplinary tourism planning and management, tourist experiences and perceptions, destination and organizational management, socio-cultural, technological, policy and methodological work.
• Publisher-displayed metrics checked 10 August 2026: CiteScore 14.9 and Impact Factor 6.9.
• Article types: empirical research articles and review articles; case studies, research notes, opinion pieces and special-issue editing are invitation-only.
• Peer review: double anonymized; suitable papers are typically sent to at least two independent reviewers.
• Publishing model: supports open access and subscription publication; Elsevier currently lists a USD 3,710 open-access APC excluding taxes, while the subscription route has no publication fee.
• Empirical-paper preparation: the journal asks for the data-collection instrument and specific reporting on scaled items and sample-size adequacy.

Journal Information at a Glance

Metrics, fees, indexing coverage and journal policies can change. Reconfirm them directly before submitting a manuscript or reporting the journal for degree, promotion or funding purposes.

What This Page Covers

• the journal’s academic role, aims and scope
• Scopus identity, indexing and current publisher-displayed metrics
• subjects, research themes and likely manuscript fit
• article types and invitation-only formats
• empirical-paper reporting expectations
• abstract, keyword, graphical-abstract, table and reference requirements
• double-anonymized peer review and publisher-displayed timelines
• open-access and subscription publishing routes
• ethics, authorship, competing interests and AI-use declarations
• journal-selection and publication-readiness checks for researchers

Methodology and Source Note

This profile was prepared from the supplied Scopus source record and authoritative publisher information, principally the official Tourism Management Perspectives journal page, the Elsevier Journal Insights page, the Guide for Authors, the journal’s official issues archive, and the supplied Scopus source identifier.

Where the official surfaced information did not provide a current numeric value—particularly SJR, SNIP and quartile—this guide does not substitute an older third-party metric. Acceptance rate is also not presented because no official acceptance-rate figure was verified. That distinction matters: a journal-selection resource is most useful when uncertainty is visible rather than filled with estimates.

What Does the Journal Actually Cover?

The journal’s scope is centered on the planning and management of travel and tourism, but it treats tourism as a system involving visitors, organizations, destinations, communities, economies and environments. Elsevier specifically highlights tourist experiences and the consequences of those experiences, image creation, tourist perceptions, destination management and the internal management of tourism organizations.

Its interdisciplinary character is important. The official scope includes socio-cultural, technological, planning and policy aspects at international, national and regional levels, alongside more focused management studies. It also explicitly welcomes papers that introduce new research methods or critically examine existing methods in tourism research. This makes methodological contribution potentially relevant when the method is firmly embedded in a tourism-management problem rather than presented as a generic technique.

Research themes that can align well

• destination planning, governance and destination management organizations
• tourist decision-making, perceptions, experiences, satisfaction and behaviour
• tourism impacts on local communities, economies and environments
• digital platforms, artificial intelligence, smart tourism and technology-enabled experiences
• sustainability, resilience, risk, climate adaptation and responsible tourism management
• hospitality and tourism organizations where the contribution is clearly tied to tourism management
• policy design, regulation and public-sector tourism planning
• branding, image formation and destination communication
• new or critically evaluated research methods applied to tourism questions

Topics become weaker candidates when tourism is merely the setting and the paper’s real contribution belongs entirely to another discipline. For example, a generic machine-learning model tested on hotel data may not fit simply because the dataset comes from tourism. The manuscript should explain what the analysis changes in tourism theory, management, policy, destination practice or methodological understanding.

What Does Tourism Management Perspectives Publish?

The official aims and scope identifies two principal submission types: data-based Empirical Research Articles and high-quality Review Articles on important topics and emerging themes that advance theoretical and conceptual understanding in travel and tourism management.

Case studies, research notes and opinion pieces are different: Elsevier states that these are by invitation from the Editor-in-Chief and gives a 2,000–5,000-word range for those invited formats. Editing a special issue is likewise invitation-only. A researcher should therefore not assume that a short case report or commentary can be submitted as a normal unsolicited manuscript.

Understanding Its Scopus Coverage and Journal Metrics

The journal is associated with Scopus Source ID 21100202157, and Elsevier lists Scopus among its indexing services. This is the key identifier for researchers who need to distinguish it from similarly named sources. The same publisher page also lists the Social Sciences Citation Index, SJR, SNIP and ABDC.

These metrics help describe citation visibility, but they should not be used as a substitute for scope analysis. A highly cited journal can still be a poor target if the manuscript’s theoretical framing, methods or audience do not align. Likewise, institutional requirements may specify not just Scopus indexing but a particular quartile, category or reporting year.

Current quartile, SJR and SNIP values are not asserted here. The official surfaced journal information used for this article names SJR and SNIP but does not expose their current numeric values. Researchers who need those metrics for a university form should consult the current database record and note the applicable year and category.

Who Should Consider Submitting?

Tourism Management Perspectives may be a credible target for doctoral researchers, academics and professionals whose work makes an explicit contribution to tourism management. The journal is broad enough for interdisciplinary work, but that breadth should not be mistaken for a general social-science remit.

For PhD scholars, journal fit should be separated from degree eligibility. A manuscript may fit the journal academically while failing a university rule about quartile, corresponding-author position, publication date or recognised database. Check those local requirements before investing heavily in submission preparation.

Preparing an Empirical Manuscript: Requirements That Deserve Attention

The journal’s empirical-paper instructions contain several details that authors should address early, not at the final upload stage. Most notably, Elsevier asks authors to attach a copy of the data-collection instrument used—such as a questionnaire or interview protocol—and to refer to that instrument within the manuscript. These materials are intended for web publication to support future comparative research.

For studies using scaled data, the journal also requests a list of items with means, standard deviations, skew and kurtosis. The rationale stated in the Guide for Authors is that statistical methods can depend on assumptions of normality, so referees and readers need enough information to judge the data. The journal further asks authors to test the adequacy of sample size.

These instructions have practical consequences. If a study uses survey scales, do not wait until submission to reconstruct item-level information. Keep the instrument, coding decisions, scale items, descriptive statistics and sample-size justification organized throughout the research process. For interviews, preserve the protocol and document how questions map to the research objectives.

Writing and Formatting Requirements Before Submission

Editable files and layout

Elsevier asks for editable source files for the full submission. Word manuscripts should be supplied as .doc or .docx files and LaTeX manuscripts as .tex files; a PDF is not accepted as the source file. Word files should use a single-column layout.

Title page

The title page should provide a concise article title, correctly ordered author names, affiliations, and a clearly designated corresponding author with current contact details. Because the journal uses double-anonymized review, authors should follow the submission system’s separation of identifying information from the anonymized manuscript where required.

Abstract and keywords

The abstract must be concise, factual and no longer than 250 words. It should summarize purpose, principal results and major conclusions and should be able to stand alone. The journal requires 1–7 keywords in English.

Highlights and graphical abstract

Highlights are encouraged and should contain 3–5 bullet points, each up to 85 characters including spaces, submitted as a separate editable file. The Guide for Authors states that a graphical abstract is required at submission. Authors should check the current image specifications directly before preparing the final graphic.

Tables, figures and references

Tables should be editable text rather than images, numbered consecutively, cited in the manuscript and supplied with captions. Reference formatting is flexible at initial submission: the journal does not impose a strict reference style at that stage as long as the references are complete and consistent. DOI links are recommended where available.

What Happens After You Submit a Manuscript?

Tourism Management Perspectives uses double-anonymized peer review. The editors first assess whether the paper is suitable for the journal. If it proceeds, Elsevier states that it will typically be sent to a minimum of two reviewers for independent expert assessment of scientific quality. Editors make the final publication decision.

The journal’s current Insights page also publishes historical timeline indicators. When checked on 10 August 2026, it displayed 8 days from submission to first decision, 58 days from submission to decision after review, 305 days from submission to acceptance, and 9 days from acceptance to online publication. These numbers are not promises for an individual manuscript. A paper requiring multiple revision rounds, specialized reviewers or ethics clarification can take a different path.

Elsevier also describes an appeal route for qualifying editorial decisions, with one appeal considered per submission. Special issues follow the same underlying peer-review standards, although a guest editor may participate in reviewer handling and recommendations under journal oversight.

Open Access, APCs and the Subscription Route

The journal supports both open-access and subscription publication. As checked on 10 August 2026, Elsevier lists an open-access Article Publishing Charge of USD 3,710 excluding taxes. The publisher notes that the amount may be reduced during submission where applicable, for example through an institutional or funder arrangement. Because charges and agreements change, authors should confirm the personalized amount within the official workflow.

The subscription route is materially different: Elsevier’s Journal Insights page states that no publication fee is charged to authors under that route, with the published article available immediately to subscribers. Choosing between the routes therefore depends on funder mandates, institutional agreements, desired reuse licensing and budget—not on any claim that paying an APC improves the editorial outcome.

Publication Ethics and Declarations

Authors are directed to Elsevier’s publishing-ethics policies. The journal’s submission declaration requires that the work has not been published previously except in permitted forms such as a preprint, abstract, lecture, academic thesis or registered report; that it is not under consideration elsewhere; and that all authors and responsible authorities approve the submission.

Authorship should reflect substantial intellectual contribution, critical drafting or revision, final approval and accountability for the work. The guide warns that authorship changes after submission are generally not encouraged and require formal justification and agreement.

Competing interests must be disclosed. The Guide for Authors also contains policies covering funding, preprints, inclusive language, sex- and gender-based analyses where relevant, generative-AI use and jurisdictional claims. Researchers using AI-assisted tools should read the current publisher policy rather than relying on a generic disclosure statement because permitted uses and disclosure language can evolve.

How to Decide Whether Your Manuscript Really Fits

A strong journal-fit decision is evidence based. Start with the official scope, then read several recent papers that resemble your research in problem type, theory, method or audience. The aim is not to imitate those papers; it is to understand what the journal treats as a meaningful tourism-management contribution.

As a publication-readiness step, write a one-paragraph “fit statement” before submission. It should identify the exact tourism-management problem, the gap, the contribution and why readers of Tourism Management Perspectives would care. If that paragraph is difficult to make specific, the target journal may need reconsideration.

Common Reasons a Paper Could Be Unsuitable

The journal does not publish a public list of desk-rejection reasons, so the following are practical interpretations of its scope and author requirements rather than official rejection criteria.

• Tourism is incidental: the manuscript could be relabeled with another industry without changing the contribution.
• Contribution is unclear: the paper reports correlations, themes or model performance without explaining what they add to tourism-management knowledge.
• Article type is wrong: an unsolicited case study, opinion piece or research note is prepared even though those formats are invitation-only.
• Empirical documentation is incomplete: instruments, scaled-item information or sample-size adequacy are not addressed.
• Literature positioning is dated or generic: the paper does not engage meaningfully with current tourism-management debates.
• Claims exceed evidence: managerial or policy recommendations are broader than the sample, design or context supports.

A Publication-Readiness Checklist Before Upload

How Contentxprtz Can Support Publication Readiness

Professional support is most useful after the research decisions are already owned by the authors. Contentxprtz can help researchers improve clarity, structure, language, consistency and compliance without taking over authorship or promising an editorial outcome.

For a manuscript targeting Tourism Management Perspectives, ethical support may include journal publication and manuscript-readiness support, academic language editing, checking the abstract against the 250-word limit, reviewing whether the tourism-management contribution is easy to identify, formatting tables and references consistently, checking submission files, and polishing a cover letter or reviewer response.

Such assistance cannot determine whether editors send the manuscript to review or whether reviewers recommend acceptance. Those decisions depend on originality, methods, evidence, fit and editorial judgement. Contentxprtz therefore does not guarantee acceptance, publication, indexing, citation performance or a particular review timeline.

Summary: Is Tourism Management Perspectives a Good Journal for Your Paper?

Tourism Management Perspectives is an active Elsevier journal with a clearly interdisciplinary tourism-management scope, Scopus Source ID 21100202157, SSCI coverage listed by the publisher, and current publisher-displayed metrics of CiteScore 14.9 and Impact Factor 6.9 as checked on 10 August 2026. It publishes empirical research and review articles, while case studies, research notes, opinion pieces and special-issue editing are invitation-only.

The journal may be a strong target when tourism management is central to the manuscript and the study offers a meaningful theoretical, conceptual, methodological, managerial or policy contribution. Authors of empirical papers should pay particular attention to the required data-collection instrument, scaled-item reporting and sample-size adequacy, alongside the general abstract, keyword, graphical-abstract, file and ethics requirements.

Before submission, confirm the latest author guidelines, APC, indexing status and any institution-specific quartile or database rules. Careful journal selection improves alignment, but no legitimate service can guarantee acceptance. Contentxprtz can support ethical manuscript preparation and publication readiness while leaving research ownership and editorial decisions where they belong—with the authors, editors and independent reviewers.