Organizational Dynamics: Scopus, Scope, Metrics & Submission Guide
Organizational Dynamics is an Elsevier journal focused on translating well-grounded scholarship into practical guidance for managers, educators and executive learners. Its centre of gravity is organizational behavior, with additional emphasis on human resource management, organizational development, strategic management and entrepreneurship. The journal is indexed in Scopus under Source ID 22328 and carries print ISSN 0090-2616 and online ISSN 1873-3530.
The most important fit question is not simply whether a manuscript concerns organizations. The journal explicitly seeks evidence-informed, conceptually strong work written for practitioners, and its author guidance states that it does not publish papers built around hypothesis tests or inferential statistical analysis. Authors therefore need to show how credible research translates into useful insight for organizational decision-makers.
Quick Answer: What Is Organizational Dynamics?
Organizational Dynamics is a peer-reviewed management journal published by Elsevier. According to the official journal page, it connects leading-edge organizational research with management practice and targets professional managers, executive-education leaders, classroom teachers and MBA students.
The journal supports open access but is not fully open access: authors may choose a paid open-access route, while the subscription route carries no publication fee for authors. The journal follows double-anonymized peer review. Before submitting, researchers should confirm that their manuscript is practitioner-facing, does not rely on inferential-statistical reporting prohibited by the journal, and follows the current Guide for Authors.
Key Takeaways
- Publisher: Elsevier; Elsevier's journal-insights comparison identifies Pergamon as the journal imprint.
- Scopus: indexed; supplied Scopus Source ID 22328 matches Organizational Dynamics.
- Scope: organizational behavior first, with HRM, organizational development, strategic management and entrepreneurship also central.
- Audience: managers, executive learners, educators and MBA students, so practical relevance and accessible writing are essential.
- Methodological fit: the Guide for Authors specifically says not to include inferential statistics or statistical tables of analysis.
- Peer review: double anonymized; suitable manuscripts are typically sent to at least two independent reviewers.
- Publishing model: hybrid; an optional open-access APC is listed by Elsevier, while subscription publication has no author publication fee.
- Metrics: current Elsevier search surfaces show a 2026 CiteScore display of 6.8; Impact Factor displays are inconsistent across official Elsevier pages, so authors should reconfirm the current JCR value before using it for institutional decisions.
Organizational Dynamics Journal Information at a Glance
| Field | Journal information |
|---|---|
| Journal name | Organizational Dynamics |
| Source type | Journal |
| Scopus Source ID | 22328 |
| Print ISSN | 0090-2616 |
| Online ISSN | 1873-3530 |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Imprint shown by Elsevier | Pergamon |
| Publication frequency | 4 issues per annual volume, according to the Elsevier Shop journal record |
| Primary subject focus | Organizational behavior; HRM; organizational development; strategic management; entrepreneurship |
| ScienceDirect subject areas | Sociology and Political Science; Applied Psychology; Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management |
| Scopus status | Indexed; verify current coverage years on the Scopus source profile |
| CiteScore | 6.8 displayed on Elsevier pages retrieved in 2026; verify the reporting year in Scopus before formal use |
| Impact Factor | Official Elsevier surfaces retrieved in 2026 are inconsistent (2.5 on some journal pages; 6.3 on a recent calls-for-papers listing). Verify the latest Journal Citation Reports value. |
| SJR / SNIP / quartile | Not assigned a numeric value here because a current official numeric value was not independently verified; check the latest applicable database/category. |
| Open access | Hybrid / supports open access |
| Open-access APC | USD 3,190 excluding taxes on the journal page retrieved during preparation; reductions may apply. Reconfirm at submission. |
| Subscription publication fee | No publication fee charged to authors, according to Elsevier |
| Peer review | Double anonymized; typically at least two reviewers after editorial screening |
| Editor-in-Chief | Daniel Tzabbar, PhD, Drexel University, as listed by Elsevier during preparation |
| Official journal page | ScienceDirect — Organizational Dynamics |
| Author guidelines | Official Guide for Authors |
Metrics, fees and editorial information can change. Treat this table as a publication-readiness snapshot and reconfirm time-sensitive items immediately before submission.
What This Page Covers
- aims, scope and likely manuscript fit
- Scopus and other indexing information
- metrics and how to interpret current discrepancies
- article style and methodological expectations
- manuscript formatting and double-anonymization requirements
- peer review, submission and publication workflow
- open-access choices and fees
- ethics, authorship, AI disclosure and research-data expectations
- a practical pre-submission checklist
- ethical ways Contentxprtz can support publication readiness
Methodology and Sources
This guide was prepared from the journal's official ScienceDirect pages, Elsevier's Guide for Authors and journal-insights information, the supplied Scopus Source ID, the Elsevier Shop journal record, and the Scopus source link. Where official pages exposed inconsistent metrics, the discrepancy is stated rather than silently resolved. Because journal metrics, fees, editorial teams, special issues and policies change over time, authors should reconfirm them on the official pages before relying on them for a thesis, promotion, funding or university publication requirement.
Organizational Dynamics Aims and Scope
The journal's defining purpose is to bridge scholarship and organizational practice. Elsevier describes its domain as primarily organizational behavior and secondarily HRM and strategic management, while newer Elsevier descriptions also foreground organizational development and entrepreneurship. Across those formulations, the stable idea is practical translation: articles should convert sound research and concepts into guidance that helps people manage organizations more effectively.
This makes the journal distinct from a conventional empirical management outlet. A technically sophisticated study can still be a poor fit if the paper is structured mainly around hypothesis testing, statistical significance and specialist debate. Conversely, a strong conceptual or evidence-informed paper can be promising when it clearly explains what managers, organizational leaders, educators or policy actors can do differently because of the evidence.
Topics likely to fit
- leadership, management practice and managerial decision-making
- organizational culture, change and development
- workforce adaptability, hybrid work and team effectiveness
- human resource management, talent, careers and employee experience
- strategy implementation and organizational effectiveness
- entrepreneurship and organizational innovation
- technology and AI at work when the managerial implications are central
- ethics, inclusion, governance and organizational responsibility
Work that may be poorly aligned
A manuscript is more likely to struggle at editorial screening if it is primarily a statistical hypothesis-testing report, presents inferential statistical tables, lacks a clear management-practice contribution, reads as a narrow disciplinary literature review without actionable implications, or uses highly technical language without translating it for the journal's practitioner and executive-education audience.
Who Should Consider Submitting?
Organizational Dynamics may suit academics and practitioner-scholars whose work sits at the intersection of rigorous knowledge and management application. It can also be relevant to doctoral or early-career researchers when their paper can be reframed beyond a thesis-style empirical report into a clear, evidence-informed contribution for organizational decision-makers.
Scopus indexing may matter to researchers whose institutions require a Scopus-listed journal, but indexing alone should not drive journal choice. A better decision combines institutional recognition, scope, recent article patterns, audience, article style and the journal's unusually explicit restriction on inferential statistical reporting.
Recent Research Themes and What They Signal About Fit
Recent ScienceDirect listings show the journal publishing on AI adoption at work, hybrid and remote team chartering, talent acquisition, workforce adaptability and gender bias in meetings. Those examples reinforce the journal's practice-facing identity: contemporary organizational problems are addressed through frameworks, evidence synthesis and managerial recommendations rather than through a conventional results-first statistical format.
For fit assessment, compare your manuscript with several recent papers and ask whether your topic, tone and contribution would feel natural beside them. This is editorial interpretation, not a formal journal rule, but it is one of the most useful ways to reduce avoidable desk-rejection risk.
Indexing, Scopus and Journal Metrics
Elsevier's journal insights list Scopus and the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) among the journal's abstracting and indexing services. The supplied Scopus identifier is Source ID 22328. Authors using the journal to satisfy a doctoral, promotion or funding criterion should verify not only that the title appears in Scopus, but also the current coverage period and the exact institutional rule that applies.
| Item | Verified or cautious status | Practical meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Scopus | Indexed; Source ID 22328 | Potentially relevant to institutions that require Scopus-listed journals, subject to their own rules. |
| SSCI | Listed by Elsevier Journal Insights | Indicates inclusion in Clarivate's Social Sciences Citation Index; verify current status directly when essential. |
| CiteScore | 6.8 on Elsevier pages surfaced in 2026 | Use the reporting year and Scopus category context when comparing journals. |
| Impact Factor | Official Elsevier pages conflict: 2.5 vs 6.3 | Do not cite a value in formal decisions until the current JCR record is checked. |
| Quartile / SJR / SNIP | Current numeric values not independently verified here | Check the latest database because category-specific quartiles and metrics can change annually. |
Article Types and Writing Style
ScienceDirect currently labels publications in Organizational Dynamics as including research articles and review articles, and its archive also contains other content types. The safest approach is to use the submission system's currently available article-type choices rather than assume every historical label remains open for unsolicited submission.
Style is unusually important. The journal asks for lively, clear writing that managers can understand. Discipline-specific terminology may be used, but it should be explained in context. The paper should show how current, well-researched knowledge helps managers deal with organizational life.
Manuscript Requirements That Matter Most
According to the official Guide for Authors, editable source files are required; Word manuscripts should use a single-column layout. The journal follows double-anonymized review, so authors must prepare a separate title page and an anonymized manuscript.
| Requirement | What to prepare |
|---|---|
| Title page | Article title, author names, affiliations, acknowledgements, declaration of interest, corresponding-author full address and email. |
| Anonymized manuscript | Main text, references, figures and tables without author names, affiliations or other identifying information. |
| Abstract | Concise, factual and no more than 250 words. |
| Keywords | 1–7 English keywords. |
| Sections | Clearly defined sections with headings; introduction, discussion and conclusion guidance applies. |
| Glossary | Definitions of field-specific terms in a separate list. |
| Statistics | Do not include inferential statistics or statistical tables of analysis. |
| Tables | Editable text, cited and numbered consecutively, with captions and notes. |
| References | Numbered in order of appearance using square brackets in text; DOI links encouraged. |
| CRediT | Corresponding authors are required to acknowledge co-author contributions using CRediT roles. |
| Language | Use American or British English consistently, not a mixture. |
The Submission and Peer-Review Process
Submission is online through Elsevier's system. The system collects manuscript metadata and uploaded files and produces a PDF for review; editable files remain necessary for production if the paper is accepted.
- Initial editorial assessment: editors check whether the manuscript suits Organizational Dynamics.
- Double-anonymized review: suitable submissions are typically sent to at least two reviewers for independent expert assessment.
- Editorial decision: editors decide whether to reject, request revision or accept.
- Revision: authors respond to reviewer and editor comments while maintaining the journal's practitioner-facing style.
- Final decision and production: accepted papers proceed to the publishing agreement, proof correction and online publication workflow.
Elsevier's journal insights display indicative publishing timelines, including a short time to first decision. These are historical/aggregate journal indicators rather than guarantees for an individual manuscript, special issue or revision cycle.
Open Access and Publication Fees
Organizational Dynamics uses a hybrid model. During preparation of this guide, Elsevier listed an open-access APC of USD 3,190 excluding taxes, with possible reductions depending on the author's circumstances. The subscription route states that no publication fee is charged to authors. Authors should verify the current personalized charge, institutional agreements and funder requirements during submission because APCs can change.
Choosing subscription publication does not mean the manuscript bypasses peer review, and choosing open access does not improve acceptance prospects. Editorial decisions should remain independent of the publication route.
Ethics, Authorship, AI and Research Data
The journal applies Elsevier's publishing-ethics framework. Submission implies that the work is not simultaneously under consideration elsewhere, that all authors approve the submission, and that authorship reflects substantial intellectual contributions and accountability.
Competing interests and funding must be disclosed. The Guide for Authors also requires authors to declare generative-AI or AI-assisted technology use in manuscript preparation when applicable, while basic grammar, spelling and reference tools are excluded from that disclosure requirement. AI tools must not be listed as authors. Authors remain responsible for verifying AI-generated material, sources and claims.
For research data, the journal applies Elsevier's Option A guidance: authors are encouraged to deposit relevant data in a repository, cite datasets and include a data-availability statement where appropriate. Confidentiality, consent and institutional requirements still govern whether data can be shared.
How to Decide Whether Your Manuscript Fits Organizational Dynamics
Use a fit test before spending time on journal-specific formatting. A manuscript is stronger for this outlet when the answer to most of the following questions is yes.
- Does the topic address a real organizational or managerial problem?
- Can the paper translate credible scholarship into practical implications?
- Is the manuscript useful to managers, educators, executive learners or organizational leaders—not only specialists?
- Can technical concepts be explained without unnecessary jargon?
- Can the paper avoid inferential-statistical reporting and statistical analysis tables?
- Does the structure resemble recent Organizational Dynamics papers more than a conventional hypothesis-testing journal article?
- Are recommendations grounded in evidence rather than opinion?
- Does the contribution add something timely, conceptually useful or actionable?
If the paper's main contribution depends on p-values, regression tables, structural models or hypothesis-confirmation claims, a conventional empirical management journal may be a better target unless the work can be responsibly reconceived around evidence-based application rather than statistical testing.
Publication-Readiness Checklist
| Check | Ready when… |
|---|---|
| Scope | The paper directly addresses organizational behavior, HRM, organizational development, strategy, entrepreneurship or a closely related management-practice issue. |
| Audience | A manager or MBA/executive-education reader can understand the argument and use the insights. |
| Evidence | Claims are supported by credible research, while the manuscript avoids prohibited inferential-statistical presentation. |
| Practical contribution | The paper explains what decision-makers can learn, change or implement. |
| Anonymization | Title page is separate and the review manuscript contains no identifying details. |
| Abstract/keywords | Abstract is ≤250 words and 1–7 keywords are supplied. |
| References | Numbering, order, bibliographic details and DOIs have been checked against original sources. |
| Declarations | Competing interests, funding, CRediT and AI-use declarations are complete where applicable. |
| Language | Clear, lively and consistent English; specialist terminology is explained. |
| Current policies | APC, metrics, submission link, editor information and author guidelines have been rechecked immediately before submission. |
Common Reasons a Paper May Be Unsuitable
Based on the journal's own positioning, likely mismatch signals include an overly academic tone with little managerial translation, a manuscript dominated by hypothesis testing or inferential statistics, a narrow methods paper without organizational application, weak linkage between theory and managerial action, or a topic that belongs mainly to another discipline without a clear organizational-dynamics contribution.
How Contentxprtz Can Support Ethical Publication Readiness
Contentxprtz can support authors with manuscript assessment, academic editing, language polishing, journal-aligned formatting, reference consistency, anonymization checks, cover-letter editing and reviewer-response editing. For a journal such as Organizational Dynamics, useful support can include checking whether the manuscript explains technical concepts for practitioner readers and whether the practical contribution is visible throughout the paper.
Professional editing cannot guarantee acceptance, indexing, peer-review success or publication. Editorial decisions belong to the journal, and authors remain responsible for their research, analysis, citations, originality, declarations and final submission.
Official Links for Authors
Summary: Is Organizational Dynamics a Good Journal for Your Paper?
Organizational Dynamics is best considered by authors who can convert rigorous organizational knowledge into clear, timely and actionable guidance for managers and executive learners. Its Scopus indexing and SSCI listing may support institutional visibility requirements, but the decisive question is fit: the paper should be practice-facing, accessible and aligned with the journal's explicit rejection of inferential-statistical reporting.
Before submission, verify the latest metrics, fee, editorial details and submission requirements directly on Elsevier and Scopus. In particular, because official Elsevier pages retrieved during preparation displayed conflicting Impact Factor values, researchers should check the current Journal Citation Reports record rather than repeat a potentially stale figure.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Organizational Dynamics?
Organizational Dynamics is an Elsevier peer-reviewed journal that links organizational scholarship with management practice, especially in organizational behavior, HRM, organizational development, strategic management and entrepreneurship.
Who publishes Organizational Dynamics?
Elsevier publishes the journal. Elsevier's journal-insights comparison identifies Pergamon as the imprint associated with the journal.
Is Organizational Dynamics indexed in Scopus?
Yes. Organizational Dynamics is listed in Scopus, and the supplied Scopus Source ID is 22328. Authors should still verify current coverage dates in the live Scopus source profile when institutional rules depend on them.
What is the Scopus Source ID for Organizational Dynamics?
The Scopus Source ID is 22328.
What is the current CiteScore of Organizational Dynamics?
Elsevier pages surfaced during 2026 show a CiteScore display of 6.8. Because CiteScore is updated periodically, verify the reporting year and latest value in Scopus before using it for formal comparison.
What is the Impact Factor of Organizational Dynamics?
Official Elsevier pages retrieved during preparation were inconsistent: some showed 2.5, while a recent Elsevier calls-for-papers listing showed 6.3. Authors should verify the current Journal Citation Reports value before citing an Impact Factor.
What subjects does Organizational Dynamics cover?
The journal focuses on organizational behavior and also covers HRM, organizational development, strategic management, entrepreneurship and related organizational-practice issues.
Does Organizational Dynamics accept hypothesis-testing papers?
The journal's Guide for Authors specifically says not to include inferential statistics or statistical tables of analysis, and the journal says it does not publish research reporting tests of hypotheses. Authors should assess whether their paper can be framed as evidence-informed practice rather than a conventional inferential-statistical report.
What peer-review model does Organizational Dynamics use?
The journal follows double-anonymized peer review. After editorial screening, suitable submissions are typically sent to at least two independent expert reviewers.
What are the abstract and keyword requirements?
The abstract should be concise and factual and must not exceed 250 words. Authors are required to provide 1–7 English keywords.
Does Organizational Dynamics charge a publication fee?
The journal offers both open-access and subscription routes. Elsevier listed an open-access APC of USD 3,190 excluding taxes during preparation, while the subscription route states that no publication fee is charged to authors. Reconfirm the current charge at submission.
Is Organizational Dynamics fully open access?
No. It supports open access through a hybrid model: authors may choose paid open access, while subscription publication is also available.
Is Organizational Dynamics suitable for PhD researchers?
It can be, particularly when a doctoral paper is strongly aligned with the journal's practitioner audience and can present credible scholarship without the inferential-statistical format the journal excludes. University publication rules should be checked separately.
How can I tell whether my manuscript fits Organizational Dynamics?
Compare the topic, writing style and contribution with recent papers; confirm that the paper addresses a real organizational problem, translates evidence into practical insight and can avoid prohibited inferential-statistical reporting.
Can Contentxprtz guarantee acceptance in Organizational Dynamics?
No. Contentxprtz can support ethical manuscript preparation, editing, formatting and publication readiness, but acceptance and publication decisions are made independently by the journal's editors and reviewers.
Conclusion
For researchers working on organizational behavior and management practice, Organizational Dynamics offers a distinctive route: it values research-informed ideas, but it expects those ideas to be translated into language and guidance that managers can use. That makes scope alignment and article design more important than simply matching a topic label. Check the current author instructions, remove inferential-statistical presentation that conflicts with the journal's policy, prepare a properly anonymized submission and verify time-sensitive metrics and fees before submitting.
