Journal of Manufacturing Processes: Scopus, Metrics, Scope & Submission Guide

Journal of Manufacturing Processes (JMP) is a manufacturing-engineering journal associated with SME and published on Elsevier’s ScienceDirect platform. Its stated purpose is to advance research, development, and implementation in manufacturing processes, with particular attention to new and efficient processes and work that can matter to practicing engineers. The supplied Scopus source record identifies the journal as Source ID 27677 with print ISSN 1526-6125.

Elsevier’s journal information lists JMP in Scopus and the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). The publisher currently displays a CiteScore of 11.1 and an Impact Factor of 6.8. Because journal metrics are reporting-period dependent and can change, researchers should confirm the latest values in Scopus and Journal Citation Reports when a university, funder, or doctoral rule requires a specific year or quartile.

For authors, the journal is especially relevant when a manuscript makes a clear contribution to manufacturing processes and connects theory, methodology, modeling, experimentation, process control, automation, fabrication, joining, forming, tribology, or related process innovation to meaningful engineering problems. Scope fit, technical novelty, reproducibility, industrial relevance, and compliance with the current Guide for Authors should all be checked before submission.

Journal Information at a Glance

What This Journal Publishes and Why It Matters

JMP is a specialist manufacturing-process journal rather than a broad business, operations-management, or general engineering outlet. Its official scope emphasizes the transformation of manufacturing through miniaturization, new materials, increasingly complex products, and both established and emerging approaches to making and processing materials and components.

The journal’s stated aim is to exchange current and future directions in manufacturing-process research, development, and implementation. It seeks archival scholarly literature that advances the state of the art and encourages innovation in new or more efficient processes. The journal also notes that it may publish innovative concepts from adjacent research communities and special-topic material on emerging technologies.

Topics explicitly represented in the official scope

• meso-, micro-, and nano-fabrication, including imprint lithography;
• advanced mechanical, chemical, and thermal manufacturing processes;
• welding, joining, and assembly at micro and macro scales;
• rapid prototyping, rapid manufacturing, repair, stereolithography, and related 3D fabrication;
• advanced embossing, casting, forming, and molding across scales;
• continuum and subcontinuum process modeling and simulation;
• manufacturing-process monitoring, control, and automation; and
• tribology and wear issues that are directly relevant to manufacturing processes.

Editorial interpretation: a manuscript is likely to have a stronger scope case when the manufacturing process itself is central to the research question. A paper whose primary contribution is, for example, a generic optimization algorithm, business analysis, or materials characterization may need to show clearly how it advances manufacturing-process understanding, capability, control, quality, or performance.

Is Journal of Manufacturing Processes Indexed in Scopus?

Yes. The task input identifies Scopus Source ID 27677, and Elsevier’s journal insights page lists Scopus under abstracting and indexing. The supplied print ISSN, 1526-6125, also matches Elsevier’s current journal information. This combination helps distinguish JMP from similarly named manufacturing publications.

Elsevier also lists the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). For researchers who must satisfy institution-specific rules—such as “Scopus indexed,” “SCIE indexed,” “Q1/Q2 only,” or a minimum Impact Factor—indexing status and metric year should be checked immediately before submission because database coverage and category rankings can change.

Understanding the Journal’s Metrics

Elsevier currently displays a CiteScore of 11.1 and an Impact Factor of 6.8 on the journal page. These are journal-level indicators, not predictions of the quality, citation count, or acceptance likelihood of any individual manuscript.

The journal page also identifies SJR and SNIP among its abstracting/metric information, but this guide does not insert numeric SJR or SNIP values because a current authoritative value was not reliably verified during preparation. Similarly, no quartile is asserted here. Quartiles are category- and year-dependent; the appropriate current quartile should be taken from the latest Scopus source details or Journal Citation Reports record relevant to the researcher’s requirement.

What Types of Manuscripts Does the Journal Consider?

The official Guide for Authors describes recently written original technical papers that establish sound theoretical concepts, provide application methodologies, and include examples or illustrations of real operating-system experience. The journal emphasizes original contributions that have not been published previously or submitted elsewhere.

The journal also mentions special-topic issues and invited papers. Authors considering a special issue should read the active call and its scope carefully rather than assuming that a paper appropriate for the regular journal automatically fits every collection.

Practical publication-readiness guidance: before submission, compare your manuscript with several recent JMP papers using similar processes or methods. Look at how authors frame novelty, validate process behavior, report experimental design, link modeling to physical evidence, and explain industrial significance.

Who Should Consider Submitting?

JMP may be appropriate for manufacturing researchers, mechanical and industrial engineers, materials and process researchers, academics, doctoral scholars, applied R&D teams, and industry professionals whose work advances manufacturing-process science or implementation.

A PhD researcher should not choose the journal merely because it is indexed or has strong metrics. The stronger question is whether the thesis-derived manuscript makes a distinct process-level contribution that matches JMP’s readership and can withstand specialist peer review. University rules regarding database coverage, quartile, journal lists, or publication timing should also be checked independently.

How to Evaluate Manuscript–Journal Fit

Preparing a Manuscript for Journal of Manufacturing Processes

Editable files and layout

Elsevier requests editable source files for the full submission. Word manuscripts should be provided as .doc or .docx in a single-column layout; LaTeX submissions should use editable .tex files. A PDF alone is not an acceptable source file. The journal encourages use of the Elsevier LaTeX template where appropriate.

Title page

The title page should provide a concise, informative article title; author names in the same order as the submission system; affiliations with full postal addresses and country; and a clearly identified corresponding author whose contact details remain current throughout review and publication.

Abstract and keywords

The abstract must be concise and factual and must not exceed 250 words. It should communicate purpose, principal results, and major conclusions, normally without references. Authors must provide 1–6 English keywords for indexing.

Highlights, figures, tables, and supporting files

Highlights are encouraged and, if supplied, should contain 3–5 bullet points, each no more than 85 characters including spaces, in a separate editable file. Tables must remain editable text, should be numbered and cited, and should avoid unnecessary shading and vertical rules. Figures and other artwork should be supplied as separate files with logical names and captions, while all images must also be cited in the text.

Article structure

The journal asks authors to use clearly defined numbered sections and subsections. Its guidance describes a conventional research flow in which the introduction states objectives without becoming an excessive literature summary; methods provide enough detail for reproduction; results are clear and reproducible; and discussion explains significance without simply repeating results.

References

JMP uses a numbered reference style: citations are indicated by numbers in square brackets in the text. Every in-text citation should correspond to the reference list and vice versa. Authors should verify bibliographic details and are encouraged to use DOI links where available.

Contributions, funding, and declarations

Corresponding authors are required to acknowledge co-author contributions using CRediT roles. Funding sources and sponsor roles must be disclosed. Authors must also complete competing-interest information and follow the journal’s current policies on authorship, research integrity, preprints, copyrighted material, and applicable ethical approvals.

Generative AI, Authorship, and Research Integrity

Elsevier’s current journal guidance requires authors to remain accountable for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of manuscript content, including any AI-assisted output they use. AI tools cannot be listed as authors or co-authors. When generative AI or AI-assisted technologies have been used in manuscript preparation beyond basic grammar, spelling, or reference checking, the journal requires an appropriate disclosure statement at submission.

The journal also states that reviewers and editors should not use generative AI tools such as public chatbots in peer-review or manuscript evaluation where this would compromise confidentiality. Because AI policies can evolve, authors should reread the official policy immediately before submission.

How Submission and Peer Review Work

The journal follows a single-anonymized peer-review process. First, the editorial team assesses whether the manuscript is suitable for the journal. If it passes this initial screening, Elsevier states that the paper will typically be sent to a minimum of two independent reviewers for expert assessment. The editors make the final acceptance or rejection decision.

The Guide for Authors separately describes the journal’s technical-paper review expectations as rigorous and emphasizes favorable evaluation by qualified researchers. This wording should not be converted into a guaranteed reviewer count for every manuscript; the operational peer-review section is the better source for what authors should expect in the current workflow.

Elsevier currently displays indicative publishing timelines of 62 days from submission to decision after review, 134 days from submission to acceptance, and 9 days from acceptance to online publication. These are journal-level historical indicators rather than promises for an individual submission; special issues, revisions, reviewer availability, manuscript complexity, and editorial decisions can change actual timing.

Open Access, APCs, and Subscription Publication

JMP currently offers two publication routes. Under gold open access, the published article is immediately and permanently available for reading and reuse under the selected Creative Commons license. Under the subscription route, no open-access publication fee is charged, although access is primarily through subscribers and access programs.

Elsevier currently lists the open-access Article Publishing Charge (APC) as USD 3,520 excluding taxes. The publisher also notes that personalized pricing, institutional agreements, country context, funder arrangements, or society membership may affect the amount presented to an author. Authors should therefore confirm the fee in the submission workflow rather than budgeting from a cached web page alone.

For subscription articles, Elsevier currently lists a 24-month embargo for public access to the accepted manuscript through an institutional repository under its self-archiving policy.

Common Reasons a Manuscript May Be Unsuitable

The journal does not publish a simple checklist of desk-rejection reasons, so the following points are practical interpretation based on its scope and author instructions rather than official rejection statistics:

• the manufacturing process is peripheral rather than central to the contribution;
• novelty is weak or the paper mainly repeats known parameter studies without a meaningful process insight;
• methods or experimental details are insufficient for reproducibility;
• the evidence does not support the claimed process improvement or mechanism;
• industrial or engineering relevance is not explained;
• the manuscript is substantially outside the journal’s process-focused scope;
• language, figures, references, or files are incomplete enough to obstruct technical evaluation; or
• submission declarations, authorship, originality, ethics, or competing-interest requirements are not satisfied.

A Practical Pre-Submission Checklist

• Read the latest aims and scope and at least several recent JMP papers closest to your process and method.
• Write one sentence explaining the manufacturing-process contribution and one sentence explaining the industrial or engineering significance.
• Confirm that the abstract is no more than 250 words and that 1–6 keywords are provided.
• Use editable source files and check every figure, caption, table, equation, and supplementary item.
• Make methods reproducible and align claims with the actual strength of evidence.
• Check numbered references, DOI information, and one-to-one consistency between citations and the bibliography.
• Complete CRediT, funding, competing-interest, ethics, permissions, and AI-use declarations where applicable.
• Reconfirm Scopus/SCIE status, current metrics or quartile if your institution imposes a formal requirement.
• Reconfirm the current APC if choosing open access.
• Use the official journal submission route linked from ScienceDirect rather than an unsolicited third-party submission service.

How Contentxprtz Can Support Publication Readiness

Preparing a manufacturing manuscript for journal submission involves more than grammar correction. The research needs to be presented with a clear contribution, defensible structure, consistent terminology, readable figures and tables, accurate references, and compliance with the journal’s current author instructions.

Contentxprtz can ethically support authors with academic editing, proofreading, journal formatting, reference and citation consistency, manuscript assessment, cover-letter editing, reviewer-response editing, thesis-to-article preparation, language polishing, and publication-readiness review. Support should strengthen the presentation of the author’s own research rather than fabricate data, citations, results, authorship, or reviewer interactions.

Contentxprtz does not control editorial decisions and does not guarantee journal acceptance or publication. The goal of professional support is to help researchers communicate their work clearly, accurately, ethically, and in line with applicable journal requirements.

Summary: Journal of Manufacturing Processes

Journal of Manufacturing Processes is an SME manufacturing-engineering journal published through Elsevier and indexed in Scopus and SCIE. The supplied Scopus identifier is Source ID 27677, with print ISSN 1526-6125 and online ISSN 2212-4616. Elsevier currently displays CiteScore 11.1 and Impact Factor 6.8, while current quartile, SJR, and SNIP values should be checked directly in the applicable database when needed.

The journal’s core interest is manufacturing-process research that advances theory, methods, modeling, fabrication, joining, forming, monitoring, automation, tribology, or related process innovation and can demonstrate relevance to engineering practice. Manuscripts are editorially screened and, if suitable, typically sent for single-anonymized external peer review.

Authors should verify the latest Guide for Authors, prepare editable source files, keep the abstract within 250 words, provide 1–6 keywords, use numbered references, complete required declarations, and confirm current open-access pricing. Journal selection should be based on scope and research fit as well as indexing or metrics.

Dr. Isha Verma

Researcher & Professional Business Writer

Dr. Isha Verma is a researcher and professional writer focused on producing insightful, accurate, and accessible content. Her work combines careful research with clear communication, helping readers engage with business topics through informed and trustworthy perspectives.

Official Sources Used

• Journal of Manufacturing Processes — ScienceDirect
• Official Guide for Authors
• Journal Insights
• Open Access Information
• Editorial Board
• Scopus Source Profile — Source ID 27677

Freshness note: metrics, APCs, indexing, editorial leadership, timelines, and policies can change. Reconfirm time-sensitive information on the official journal, Scopus, and Clarivate pages immediately before submission or institutional reporting.