IIMB Management Review: Scopus, Scope & Submission Guide
IIMB Management Review (IMR) is the quarterly flagship management journal of the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore (IIMB). It publishes research intended for management researchers, academics and practitioners, with a clear preference for work that combines analytical rigour with useful managerial insight. The journal is indexed in Scopus, is distributed through Elsevier's ScienceDirect platform, and operates as a Gold Open Access journal.
For a researcher deciding whether to submit, the most important question is not simply whether IMR is indexed. A stronger decision combines scope fit, contribution to management literature, audience, manuscript type, peer-review expectations, open-access arrangements and the current requirements in the official author guide. This page brings those points together using current IIMB and Elsevier information available on 10 August 2026.

Quick answer: what is IIMB Management Review?
IMR is a peer-reviewed management journal published quarterly by IIM Bangalore, with production and online hosting through Elsevier. Its scope spans core business functions, policy and management pedagogy. The journal particularly values research that advances understanding of emerging economies or develops models and managerial implications suited to those contexts.
It is indexed in Scopus and is also listed by Elsevier as covered by DOAJ, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), SJR, SNIP and the Australian Business Deans Council list. Researchers should nevertheless confirm the exact database status, quartile and metric year required by their university before relying on any journal for degree, appraisal or funding purposes.
Key takeaways for researchers
- Publisher and institutional home: IIM Bangalore brings out the journal; Elsevier hosts/publishes it through ScienceDirect.
- Scopus: IMR is indexed in Scopus; the supplied Scopus Source ID is 19700175280.
- Identifiers: Print ISSN 0970-3896; online ISSN 2212-4446.
- Scope: management and core business functions, with strong interest in emerging-economy research and managerial implications.
- Article types: full-length research articles are central; focused discussions, interview papers and book reviews are also featured.
- Peer review: double anonymized, with initial editorial assessment followed by independent expert review for suitable papers.
- Open access: Gold Open Access; readers can access articles through ScienceDirect.
- Submission readiness: the manuscript must be rigorous, accessible and clearly show its contribution to existing management literature.
Journal information at a glance
| Field | Journal information |
|---|---|
| Journal name | IIMB Management Review (IMR) |
| Source type | Peer-reviewed scholarly journal |
| Institutional publisher | Indian Institute of Management Bangalore |
| Publishing / hosting platform | Elsevier / ScienceDirect |
| ISSN | 0970-3896 |
| EISSN | 2212-4446 |
| Scopus Source ID | 19700175280 |
| Publication frequency | Quarterly |
| Language | English; current author guidance specifies British spelling except in direct quotations |
| Primary subject focus | Management and core business functions; policy; management pedagogy; emerging economies |
| Scopus status | Indexed; verify current source profile before submission |
| Other indexing listed by Elsevier | DOAJ, ESCI, SJR, SNIP, ABDC |
| CiteScore | 3.0 displayed by IIMB in August 2026; verify current annual Scopus edition |
| Five-year Impact Factor | 1.9 displayed by IIMB in August 2026; verify current JCR year/value |
| Acceptance rate | 6% displayed by IIMB in August 2026 |
| Review timeline | 179 days displayed by IIMB in August 2026; not a guaranteed manuscript timeline |
| SJR / SNIP / quartile | Official accessible pages confirm these indicators are associated with the journal, but a current value/category was not reliably surfaced here; verify in Scopus/SCImago before use |
| Open access | Gold Open Access |
| APC | ScienceDirect has listed USD 1,200; IIMB has also stated that APCs are borne by IIM Bangalore on behalf of authors. Confirm current author liability before submission. |
| Current Editor-in-Chief | Sushanta K. Mishra (confirmed in the June 2026 editorial) |
| Submission system | Editorial Manager |
Metric values, editorial teams, indexing status, APC arrangements and turnaround indicators can change. This guide therefore dates each sensitive value and links to official sources for reconfirmation.
How this guide was researched
The journal-specific facts in this page were checked primarily against IIM Bangalore's official IMR website, the current IIMB author-guideline pages, Elsevier's ScienceDirect journal page and Guide for Authors, and the journal's official Scopus identity supplied for this task. Where an official value could not be confirmed reliably—particularly a current SJR, SNIP or subject-specific quartile—this page does not substitute a third-party estimate.
IIMB Management Review aims and scope: where manuscripts fit
IMR's editorial position is broader than a narrow specialist journal but more specific than a general business magazine. The journal asks for manuscripts that engage with management practices, concepts and ideas while delivering novel managerial insights. Rigour matters: findings are expected to be supported by empirical evidence or by a well-justified theoretical model. Yet technical sophistication alone is not enough; the work also needs to be well communicated and to contribute to the existing management literature.
The journal's explicit interest in emerging economies is an important fit signal. A paper can be relevant because it investigates markets, organisations or managerial behaviour in an emerging-economy setting, or because it develops a model that takes distinctive institutional or market characteristics into account. This does not mean every manuscript must focus on India. It does mean that authors should be able to explain why the context generates knowledge or managerial insight beyond a purely local description.
Likely stronger fit
Empirical or theoretical management research with a clear contribution, managerial implications, rigorous method and relevance to core business functions or emerging-economy contexts.
Likely weaker fit
A technically competent paper that lacks a management contribution, offers only descriptive local findings, has no credible managerial implications, or sits mainly outside business, management, policy or pedagogy.
Subjects and recent research themes
The formal scope covers all core business functions, policy and management pedagogy. Elsevier's subject labels include Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, and Strategy and Management. Recent 2025–2026 issues show how this broad management remit is applied in practice: published work has examined financial markets, stock forecasting, agricultural credit scoring using NLP and machine learning, emotional labour measurement in hospitality, green technology and exports, workplace spirituality, remote careers, ESG and cost of equity, banking penetration and sustainable assets.
These recent examples are useful because they show that IMR accepts diverse methods—econometric, behavioural, machine-learning, measurement-development and conceptual approaches—when the study is tied back to management questions. A researcher working in fintech, HR, sustainability, operations, strategy, organisational behaviour or management analytics may therefore find a route into the journal, but the manuscript still needs to make the managerial relevance explicit.
Article types and manuscript length
Full-length research articles are the journal's core content. The current Guide for Authors recommends a maximum length of 8,000 words inclusive of tables and figures. IIMB also identifies focused discussion papers, interview papers and book reviews as formats that appear in the journal. Authors should not assume that every non-research format is open for unsolicited submission at all times; the safest approach is to check the live submission system and current calls for papers.
Practical publication-readiness point
Before drafting to the 8,000-word ceiling, examine several recent IMR papers in your specific area. Compare how they position the research problem, explain the emerging-economy or managerial relevance, present methods, and translate results into implications. That comparison is general journal-selection practice, not an official acceptance formula.
Understanding Scopus coverage and journal metrics
IMR is officially identified as indexed in Scopus, with Source ID 19700175280. For PhD scholars or faculty members whose institutions specify Scopus-listed journals, this can be an important eligibility factor. However, an institution may also require a particular quartile, current year of coverage, subject category, or active status; those details should be checked in the live Scopus source profile rather than inferred from an old screenshot or third-party ranking site.
The IIMB homepage displayed a CiteScore of 3.0, a five-year Impact Factor of 1.9, an acceptance rate of 6% and a 179-day review timeline when this guide was updated. Elsevier pages can show different snapshots because reporting cycles and page refresh dates differ. Accordingly, use the latest database year when quoting a metric in a thesis proposal, promotion dossier or journal-comparison table.
Open access and publication fees
IIMB describes IMR as a Gold Open Access journal and states that its published articles are freely available to readers through ScienceDirect. The fee position requires slightly more care. ScienceDirect's journal insights have listed an APC of USD 1,200, while IIMB's own editorial communications have stated that the APC is borne by IIM Bangalore on behalf of authors. Those statements can coexist if an institutional sponsor covers a formally listed APC, but authors should confirm the current arrangement before submission rather than assuming they will either pay or publish free of charge.
What happens after you submit a manuscript?
The journal uses a double-anonymized review process. Submissions are first assessed for suitability. Papers that pass the initial screen are generally sent to at least two independent expert reviewers. The editor remains responsible for the final publication decision.
This structure makes the first editorial screen important. A manuscript can be methodologically sound but still fail early if its topic, contribution, article type or presentation does not fit IMR. Authors therefore benefit from making the journal fit visible in the title, abstract, introduction and discussion rather than expecting reviewers to infer it.
Current submission and formatting requirements
The Elsevier Guide for Authors currently directs submissions to the journal's Editorial Manager system. For double-anonymized review, authors should prepare a separate title page containing author names, affiliations, acknowledgements, declaration of interest information and the corresponding author's full contact details, while the main manuscript should remove identifying information.
| Element | Current guidance to check |
|---|---|
| Cover/title page | Article title, short title (not more than five words), author names, affiliations, contact details and designated corresponding author. |
| Second page | Article title, short title, abstract not more than 100 words, up to 8 keywords and an extended summary not exceeding 300 words. |
| Main manuscript | Recommended maximum 8,000 words inclusive of tables and figures. |
| Text format | Times New Roman, 12-point, double-spaced is stated in the current guide. |
| Language | British spelling, except for direct quotations. |
| Tables and figures | Serially numbered and referenced sequentially; current guidance also asks for exhibits in a separate Word file and describes black-and-white presentation. |
| References | Follow the current journal examples or the journal template in supported reference-management software; remove field codes before electronic submission. |
| Originality | Submission implies original work, no significant prior publication, no simultaneous consideration elsewhere, and compliance with copyright requirements. |
Because final-manuscript and production instructions may differ from first-submission requirements, always use the live Elsevier Guide for Authors as the operational authority. Older IIMB repository style pages can be useful historical references but should not override the current submission guide.
Ethics, originality and responsible AI use
Elsevier's current guide requires authors to take responsibility for originality, copyright compliance and transparency. Manuscripts using non-public organisational information need appropriate permission. The guide also includes a declaration requirement for generative AI or AI-assisted technologies used in manuscript preparation: authors must review and verify AI output, retain responsibility for the final work, protect confidential or proprietary information, and disclose qualifying use in the manuscript. AI tools must not be listed as authors or co-authors.
For researchers, this means language polishing or technical assistance does not transfer responsibility away from the authors. Data, interpretation, citations, claims, disclosures and final submission choices remain the authors' responsibility. Any professional editing service should work within those boundaries.
Five journal-fit scenarios
1. Strong scope match
A finance researcher studies how green technology adoption affects exporting firms in an emerging economy, using robust causal analysis and translating the findings into managerial decisions. The theme and managerial orientation resemble recent IMR interests.
2. Methodologically strong, weak management link
A machine-learning paper predicts an outcome accurately but does not explain a management problem, decision or contribution. The method alone may not create sufficient fit; the management question must lead the paper.
3. Local descriptive study
A survey reports attitudes in one organisation but offers little theory, comparison or transferable insight. Strengthening the literature contribution and explaining why the context matters would be important before considering IMR.
4. ESL manuscript with sound research
The empirical work is credible, but dense sentences obscure the hypotheses and managerial implications. Academic editing may improve clarity, but it should preserve the authors' analysis and never invent findings or references.
5. Major revision
An author receives reviewer requests for additional analysis and conceptual clarification. A strong response letter addresses every comment point by point, identifies exactly where the manuscript changed and gives evidence-based reasons for any suggestion not adopted.
Pre-submission checklist for IIMB Management Review
Is IIMB Management Review suitable for PhD researchers?
Potentially, yes—especially for doctoral work in management, business, economics-related managerial questions, technology and innovation, organisational behaviour, HR, finance, strategy, sustainability or policy. But suitability depends on the paper, not the author's degree status. A thesis chapter that is mostly descriptive, too broad, or still written like a dissertation may need substantial reframing before it functions as an IMR article.
PhD scholars should also check their university's exact publication rule. Some institutions accept any active Scopus-indexed journal; others specify quartiles, lists, years of coverage or subject categories. The journal's visibility is relevant, but institutional compliance and manuscript fit are separate questions.
How Contentxprtz can support publication readiness
Preparing for IMR involves more than grammar correction. The manuscript needs a clear management contribution, disciplined structure, accessible explanation of specialised methods, consistent British-English usage, accurate references, correctly prepared submission files and a strong statement of managerial implications.
Contentxprtz can support authors with manuscript assessment, academic editing, proofreading, ESL language polishing, journal formatting, reference and citation consistency, title and abstract refinement, cover-letter editing, submission-document review and reviewer-response editing. Support should strengthen how authors communicate their own research; it should not fabricate data, invent citations, conceal prohibited assistance or imply influence over editors.
Preparing a manuscript for IIMB Management Review?
Explore ethical manuscript editing and publication-readiness support to improve clarity, journal alignment, formatting and submission documentation. Contentxprtz does not control editorial decisions and does not guarantee acceptance or publication.
Explore Journal Publication SupportSummary: IIMB Management Review
IIMB Management Review is a quarterly, peer-reviewed management journal of IIM Bangalore, published online through Elsevier and indexed in Scopus under Source ID 19700175280. Its strongest editorial signals are rigour, contribution to management literature, accessible presentation, managerial implications and a special interest in emerging-economy research. Full research articles up to 8,000 words form the core of the journal, and the review model is double anonymized.
As of this update, IIMB displays a CiteScore of 3.0, a five-year Impact Factor of 1.9, a 6% acceptance rate and a 179-day review timeline. The journal is Gold Open Access. Because metrics, fees and submission rules change, authors should reconfirm all decision-critical details on the official IIMB, Elsevier and Scopus pages immediately before submission.
Official sources and verification links
- IIMB Management Review official homepage — journal identity, current displayed metrics, publication frequency and Gold Open Access status.
- IIMB Guidelines for Authors — scope, article types and accessible-writing expectations.
- IIMB Management Review on ScienceDirect — Elsevier journal profile, issues, identifiers and publishing information.
- Elsevier Guide for Authors — submission system, peer review, anonymization, manuscript components, ethics and production guidance.
- Scopus source profile: 19700175280 — verify active coverage, current CiteScore, subject categories and quartiles.
- June 2026 Editor's Desk — current Editor-in-Chief, recent journal developments and Gold Open Access confirmation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is IIMB Management Review?
IIMB Management Review (IMR) is the quarterly flagship management journal of the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore. It publishes rigorous, accessible management research with an emphasis on managerial insight and a particular interest in emerging-economy contexts.
Who publishes IIMB Management Review?
The journal is brought out by the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore. ScienceDirect identifies Elsevier Ltd. as the publishing platform/production publisher, while copyright is held by the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore.
Is IIMB Management Review indexed in Scopus?
Yes. IIMB and the journal’s official information state that IIMB Management Review is indexed in Scopus. The supplied Scopus Source ID is 19700175280. Authors whose universities require Scopus-indexed publication should still verify the source profile immediately before submission.
What are the ISSN and EISSN of IIMB Management Review?
The print ISSN is 0970-3896 and the online ISSN is 2212-4446.
What subjects does IIMB Management Review cover?
The journal covers management and core business functions, including strategy, finance, economics, marketing, operations, technology and innovation, organisational behaviour, human resources, policy and management pedagogy. It gives special attention to work that generates insights for emerging economies.
What is the current CiteScore of IIMB Management Review?
The IIMB journal homepage displayed a CiteScore of 3.0 when this guide was updated on 10 August 2026. Because CiteScore is refreshed by Scopus on a reporting cycle, authors should verify the current annual value in the Scopus source profile.
Does IIMB Management Review have an Impact Factor?
Yes. The IIMB journal homepage displayed a five-year Impact Factor of 1.9 in August 2026. ScienceDirect had previously displayed other metric snapshots, so authors should confirm the current Journal Citation Reports value and metric year before using it for institutional evaluation.
What is the acceptance rate of IIMB Management Review?
The IIMB journal homepage displayed an acceptance rate of 6% in August 2026. Acceptance rates can change as submission volume and editorial decisions change, so treat this as a dated journal-reported figure rather than a guarantee of future selectivity.
How long does peer review take at IIMB Management Review?
The IIMB homepage displayed a review timeline of 179 days in August 2026. Actual manuscript timelines vary by editorial screening, reviewer availability and revision cycles; authors should not treat the displayed figure as a promised decision date.
Is IIMB Management Review open access?
Yes. IIMB states that the journal is Gold Open Access and that readers can access and download its articles through ScienceDirect without a subscription.
Does IIMB Management Review charge an APC?
ScienceDirect has listed an APC of USD 1,200, while IIMB has stated that article processing charges have been borne by IIM Bangalore on behalf of authors. Because responsibility for the APC can change, authors should verify the current charge and any institutional sponsorship on the official journal page before submission.
What types of manuscripts does IIMB Management Review accept?
Full-length research articles form the core of the journal, with a recommended maximum of 8,000 words inclusive of tables and figures. The journal also features focused discussion papers, interview papers and book reviews.
How do I submit a paper to IIMB Management Review?
The current Elsevier guide directs authors to the journal’s Editorial Manager submission system. Authors should prepare a title page with author information and a separate anonymized manuscript for double-anonymized peer review, then follow the current online checklist.
Is IIMB Management Review suitable for PhD researchers?
It can be suitable when a doctoral manuscript makes a clear contribution to management literature, fits the journal’s scope and audience, and meets institutional requirements. Scopus indexing by itself does not make the journal appropriate for every PhD paper.
Can Contentxprtz guarantee acceptance in IIMB Management Review?
No. Contentxprtz can support manuscript assessment, editing, proofreading, journal formatting, reference consistency and publication-readiness checks, but all editorial and publication decisions remain solely with IIMB Management Review and its editors.
