EURO Journal on Decision Processes: Scopus, Scope & Submission Guide

Quick Answer: What Is EURO Journal on Decision Processes?

EJDP is a specialist operational-research journal centered on decision processes. EURO’s official description says it promotes scientific knowledge on theoretical, methodological, behavioural and organizational topics that improve understanding and appropriate use of operational research across different phases of decision making. It accepts both qualitative and quantitative approaches to scoping, modelling and solving decision problems.

The journal primarily publishes original research articles, while surveys and tutorials may also be considered. Researchers working in decision analysis, multi-criteria decision aiding, process design, model validity, communication, data mining, forecasting, optimization, simulation or performance measurement may find the journal relevant when these methods are meaningfully connected to decision-process questions.

Before submitting, authors should verify the live Guide for Authors, the current APC arrangement, the latest journal metrics and whether recent EJDP papers demonstrate a clear thematic and methodological fit with the proposed manuscript.

Key Takeaways for Researchers

• Publisher and society: Elsevier publishes EJDP in collaboration with EURO, which identifies it as an official EURO journal.
• Scopus: Elsevier lists EJDP in Scopus; the supplied Source ID is 21100901158.
• Scope: the journal emphasizes the connection between operational research and decision processes, including theoretical, methodological, behavioural and organizational contributions.
• Article types: original research articles are primary; surveys and tutorials can also be considered.
• Open access: the journal is fully open access. Elsevier lists an APC of USD 1,400 excluding taxes, subject to current waiver/support arrangements.
• Peer review: Elsevier states that EJDP uses single-anonymized review and typically sends suitable submissions to at least two independent reviewers.
• Metrics: Elsevier displayed a CiteScore of 4.7 and Impact Factor of 2.1 when checked; quartiles vary by metric and category, so authors should never quote “Q1/Q2/Q3” without the year and category.

Journal Information at a Glance

How This Guide Was Verified

This profile was prepared using the journal’s official Elsevier/ScienceDirect pages, the official EURO society page, the journal’s Guide for Authors, DOAJ and the supplied Scopus source record. Official sources were prioritized over ranking aggregators. Where a current value was not directly exposed by an authoritative source, the guide either identifies the reporting year or advises readers to reconfirm it.

Journal information is time-sensitive. APCs, waiver arrangements, metrics, editorial roles, timelines, author instructions and indexing status can change. Always check the live journal pages immediately before submission or before using a metric for an institutional requirement.

EURO Journal on Decision Processes Aims and Scope

EJDP’s scope is built around the relationship between operational research (OR) and decision processes. EURO describes the journal as publishing knowledge on theoretical, methodological, behavioural and organizational topics that help researchers understand and appropriately use OR in different phases of decision making.

Methodologically, the journal accommodates both qualitative and quantitative approaches. This is important for authors whose work combines formal models with problem structuring, stakeholder engagement, behavioural considerations, organizational implementation or communication. The scope explicitly mentions advances in problem structuring, decision analysis and multi-criteria decision aiding; questions of process design, model validity and communication associated with data mining, forecasting, optimization, simulation and performance measurement; and reflective accounts of OR applications.

Application areas named in the official scope include energy, engineering, environment, finance, health care and operations management. These examples signal that EJDP is not limited to one industry. The journal’s defining question is whether the research generates useful knowledge about decision processes and the contribution of OR to them.

What Subjects and Research Themes Fit EJDP?

Recent official article collections reinforce the journal’s continuing interest in multi-objective optimization, fair and explainable decision support, decision processes in policy design, and human-centric decision and negotiation support for societal transitions. These themes should be treated as evidence of editorial interest, not as a guarantee that similarly titled work will be accepted.

Understanding Its Scopus Coverage and Journal Metrics

Scopus and other indexing

Elsevier lists EJDP as indexed in Scopus, DOAJ and the Emerging Sources Citation Index. The task input identifies Scopus Source ID 21100901158, which is the most reliable way to distinguish the journal from similarly named titles. DOAJ lists the online ISSN as 2193-9446 and identifies Elsevier as publisher with EURO as the associated organization.

CiteScore and quartile context

Elsevier’s journal-insights page displayed a CiteScore of 4.7 when checked for this guide. EURO’s own journal page reports the 2024 Scopus CiteScore position as 40 of 293 journals in Statistics and Probability, which corresponds to Q1 for that category and year.

Impact Factor, SJR and SNIP

Elsevier’s page displayed an Impact Factor of 2.1 at the time of verification. EURO’s page reports the 2024 Journal Impact Factor position as 260 of 420 journals in Management, corresponding to Q3. EURO also reports the 2024 SCImago ranking as Q2 in Applied Mathematics. An institutional library cross-check lists 2024 SJR 0.595 and SNIP 0.884. Because newer metric releases may become available after publication of this guide, verify the latest values directly in JCR, Scopus and SCImago before citing them.

What Does the Journal Publish?

The official scope states that EJDP primarily publishes original research articles. It may also consider surveys and tutorials. A strong original article should make a defensible scholarly contribution rather than simply demonstrate that a known method works on another dataset.

Surveys are more likely to fit when they synthesize a research area in a way that advances understanding of decision processes, exposes methodological or conceptual gaps, or provides a useful organizing framework. Tutorials should provide rigorous educational value around methods or approaches relevant to EJDP’s decision-process mission.

Authors considering special issues should review the journal’s current article-collection page. Special-issue peer review follows the journal’s normal standards; Elsevier states that a guest editor may manage reviews and recommend a decision, while the journal editor oversees the process and remains responsible for the final acceptance or rejection decision.

Is This Journal a Good Match for Your Manuscript?

A practical fit test is to ask whether the manuscript can answer all three questions below with specific evidence:

1. What decision process is being studied or supported? The paper should identify the actors, phases, constraints, objectives or organizational context that make the decision problem meaningful.
2. What does operational research contribute? The method should provide a clear analytical, methodological, behavioural or organizational contribution—not simply serve as a technical tool with no decision-process insight.
3. What new knowledge follows? The paper should explain what researchers or decision makers learn about the process, the model’s validity or use, trade-offs, communication, implementation, or decision quality.

For PhD scholars, EJDP may be relevant when a thesis paper sits directly at this OR–decision-process intersection. Whether the journal satisfies a university’s publication rule depends on that institution’s own approved-index, quartile, JCR or Scopus requirements; authors should obtain current confirmation rather than assume that one quartile label applies universally.

Preparing a Manuscript for EJDP

Editable source files and layout

Elsevier asks authors to provide editable source files for the complete submission. Word files should use .doc or .docx and a single-column layout; LaTeX submissions may use double-column formatting. PDF is not accepted as the editable source file for production.

Title page, abstract and keywords

The title page should include a concise informative title, author names in submission order, affiliations and a clearly designated corresponding author. The abstract must be concise and factual and should not exceed 250 words. Elsevier asks for 1 to 6 English keywords. Highlights are encouraged and should capture the study’s novel results and any new methods.

Section structure and reproducibility

The author guide asks for clearly defined and numbered sections and subsections. The introduction should state the objectives and provide adequate background without becoming an exhaustive literature review. Methods should include enough detail for an independent researcher to reproduce the work, while previously published methods should be summarized and cited appropriately.

References, Data and Submission Files

EJDP’s Elsevier guide uses a numbered citation system: references are indicated by numbers in square brackets in the text. Authors should ensure every in-text citation appears in the reference list and vice versa. The guide encourages DOI links because they improve discoverability and reliable linking.

Elsevier also encourages citation and sharing of relevant research data. Depending on the study, “research data” can include observations, software, code, models, algorithms, protocols and methods. Authors should follow the current research-data policy, use appropriate repositories when feasible, and cite datasets with persistent identifiers.

The submission checklist includes a designated corresponding author with complete contact details; uploaded manuscript files, keywords, captions, tables, supplementary materials and videos where applicable; completed spelling and grammar checks; permission for copyrighted material; and author awareness of APC responsibility for accepted open-access articles when not otherwise covered.

What Happens After You Submit a Manuscript?

Elsevier describes EJDP as using single-anonymized peer review. The editors first assess whether the submission is suitable for the journal. A paper that passes this editorial screening is typically sent to at least two independent reviewers for expert assessment of scientific quality. Editors make the final decision on acceptance or rejection.

The journal-insights page lists 245 days from submission to acceptance and 7 days from acceptance to online publication. DOAJ reports an average of approximately 38 weeks from submission to publication. These figures are historical journal-level indicators rather than promised timelines; review duration varies by manuscript, reviewer availability and revision cycles.

Elsevier permits a formal appeal of an editorial decision when the appeal meets its policy requirements, with one appeal considered per submission. At proof stage, corresponding authors are asked to return corrections promptly; the guide states that proofs are normally expected within two days.

Open Access, APCs and Licensing

EJDP is an open-access journal. Elsevier’s current journal-insights page lists an APC of USD 1,400, excluding taxes. The same page states that the open-access APC will be covered by EURO for articles submitted by 31 December 2026 when the author’s institution does not provide open-access support, with authors advised to contact the Journal Manager for details.

DOAJ reports that the journal has a waiver policy and uses Creative Commons licensing, including CC BY and CC BY-NC-ND options. Authors should review the live license choices, funder requirements and institutional agreements during submission. Because APC support programs can change, do not assume a fee waiver or society coverage until eligibility is confirmed in writing or through the submission system.

Publication Ethics and Responsible Use of AI

Authors must follow Elsevier’s publishing-ethics policies. Submission implies that the work has not been published previously except in permitted forms such as a preprint, abstract, lecture, thesis or registered report; is not under consideration elsewhere; and has been approved by all authors and relevant responsible authorities.

Elsevier requires substantive author contributions and accountability for the accuracy and integrity of the work. When generative AI or AI-assisted technologies are used in manuscript preparation, authors are responsible for checking accuracy, comprehensiveness, impartiality, sources and originality, and for making required disclosures. AI tools must not be listed as authors. Basic grammar, spelling and reference-checking tools may fall outside the disclosure requirement, but authors should follow the current policy wording at the time of submission.

Ethical publication readiness also means avoiding fabricated data, invented citations, undisclosed authorship manipulation and peer-review interference. Professional editing can improve clarity and consistency, but the researcher remains responsible for the study, interpretation, references and final submission.

Common Reasons a Manuscript May Be a Weak Fit

• The paper presents an optimization, simulation or machine-learning model without explaining its role in a decision process.
• The research problem is operational or computational but lacks a clear decision-making contribution.
• The manuscript is mainly an application report with limited transferable theoretical, methodological, behavioural or organizational insight.
• The novelty claim depends only on applying a familiar method to a new dataset or location.
• The manuscript does not engage with recent work on decision processes or operational-research methodology relevant to EJDP.
• The abstract and introduction emphasize technique but do not articulate the decision context, stakeholders, process or implications.

These points are publication-readiness guidance based on the journal’s stated scope, not a statement of automatic rejection criteria. Editorial decisions depend on the complete manuscript and the journal’s current priorities.

A Journal-Aligned Pre-Submission Checklist

Official Sources and Links

• Elsevier / ScienceDirect journal page
• Elsevier journal insights
• Official Guide for Authors
• EURO official EJDP page
• DOAJ journal record
• Scopus source profile

Final Assessment: Who Should Consider EJDP?

EURO Journal on Decision Processes is best considered by researchers whose work sits clearly at the intersection of operational research and decision processes. It is particularly relevant when a study contributes to problem structuring, decision analysis, multi-criteria decision aiding, process design, model validity, communication, optimization, simulation, forecasting, performance measurement or other OR methods while also producing insight about how decisions are framed, supported or implemented.

Before submission, compare the manuscript with recent EJDP papers, verify the current Guide for Authors and APC arrangements, and confirm any indexing or quartile requirement with the exact database and reporting year used by your institution. Strong journal selection begins with scope fit; careful formatting and language polishing can support a good paper, but neither professional editing nor any third party can guarantee acceptance.