Journal Profile & Submission Guide

Emerging Markets Review: Scopus Indexing, Scope, Metrics & Submission Guide

A researcher-focused guide to Emerging Markets Review, covering its aims and scope, Scopus identity, current journal metrics, article fit, publication options, editorial information and practical submission-readiness checks.

Updated: 10 August 2026Publisher: ElsevierScopus Source ID: 14453
Contentxprtz guide to Emerging Markets Review journal selection and submission
Journal selection should combine verified indexing and metrics with a close evaluation of scope, methods, contribution and author guidelines.

Emerging Markets Review is an international Elsevier journal centered on high-impact empirical and theoretical research in emerging-markets finance. Its official scope gives particular attention to comparative work with global or regional perspectives, policy-relevant single-country studies whose implications extend beyond one market, research on the interaction of national and international financial architecture, and work that combines institutional and financial perspectives.

For authors, the central question is not simply whether a manuscript mentions an emerging economy. The more useful test is whether the paper makes a finance-relevant contribution that uses an emerging-market setting to address a significant theoretical, empirical, institutional or policy problem. Recent journal content spans sovereign risk, household finance, corporate finance, financial inclusion, institutional ownership, green finance, capital flows and financial-market development, illustrating the breadth possible within a clearly finance-oriented frame.

Quick Answer: What Is Emerging Markets Review?

Emerging Markets Review (EMR) is a peer-reviewed finance journal published by Elsevier. The supplied source record identifies Scopus Source ID 14453; Elsevier lists print ISSN 1566-0141 and online ISSN 1873-6173. The journal is indexed in Scopus and the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI).

Elsevier currently displays a CiteScore of 8.8, Impact Factor of 4.6, and an 18% acceptance rate. It supports both subscription publication and optional open access. Authors should verify all live metrics, fees, category quartiles and policies immediately before submission because these can change between reporting years.

Key Takeaways

Journal Information at a Glance

Emerging Markets Review journal profile
FieldJournal information
Journal nameEmerging Markets Review
Source typeJournal
PublisherElsevier; North-Holland appears as the imprint in Elsevier journal comparison information
Scopus Source ID14453
Print ISSN1566-0141
Online ISSN1873-6173
Core subject areasFinance; Economics and Econometrics; Business and International Management
Scopus / SSCIScopus: indexed; Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI): listed by Elsevier
CiteScore8.8 (current value displayed by Elsevier)
Impact Factor4.6 (current value displayed by Elsevier)
SJR / SNIP2024 Scopus metrics record: SJR 1.404; SNIP 1.916
Quartile2024 Scopus metrics record: Q1 in Economics and Econometrics; verify the latest category-specific quartile
Acceptance rate18% currently reported by Elsevier Journal Insights
Publication modelHybrid: subscription or optional open access
Open-access APCUSD 3,320 excluding taxes, subject to current agreements/discounts
Editor-in-ChiefR.C. Liao, PhD, Rutgers University Newark Business School
FrequencyElsevier Shop currently lists 6 volumes / 6 issues annually
Official journal siteScienceDirect journal page
Scopus profileScopus Source ID 14453

What This Page Covers

Methodology and Source Note

This profile was prepared from the journal identity supplied with this task and cross-checked against authoritative or institutionally maintained sources, prioritizing Elsevier/ScienceDirect for scope, ISSNs, editorial leadership, publication options, impact figures and journal-level timelines; the supplied Scopus Source ID for journal identification; and an institutional library record reporting 2024 Scopus journal metrics. Metrics, fees, indexing, editorial appointments and policies can change, so researchers should reconfirm live information before using the journal for university, funding or promotion requirements.

What Is Emerging Markets Review?

Emerging Markets Review is a specialist finance journal whose organizing context is the economic, institutional and market structure of emerging economies. It is not merely a country-studies outlet. Its editorial positioning emphasizes questions that matter to financial research and that can produce insight extending beyond a single descriptive setting.

The journal has published research involving market development, corporate finance, international finance, banking and credit, household portfolios, financial inclusion, sustainability and green finance, ownership structures, capital markets, exchange rates, sovereign finance and cross-border investment. This suggests room for different empirical designs and data sources, provided the research question remains meaningfully connected to emerging-markets finance.

Emerging Markets Review Aims and Scope

The official aims and scope describe an ambition to publish high-impact empirical and theoretical studies in emerging-markets finance. Comparative studies with global or regional perspectives are explicitly favored. Detailed single-country studies can fit when they address critical policy questions and generate implications that matter at regional or global level. The journal also highlights research about interactions between national and international financial architecture and welcomes institutional perspectives alongside conventional financial analysis.

Topics that may align well

Markets and asset pricing

Emerging equity and bond markets, risk premia, market microstructure, investor behavior, exchange rates, portfolio allocation and international asset pricing.

Corporate and banking finance

Capital structure, ownership, governance, credit supply, lending, financial constraints, cross-border investment and firm financing in emerging economies.

Institutions and policy

Financial regulation, sovereign risk, monetary and financial architecture, institutional quality, policy shocks and their financial consequences.

Development and sustainability

Financial inclusion, household finance, green finance, climate risk, biodiversity finance, ESG and the links between finance and socioeconomic development.

Potentially weak fits include manuscripts that use an emerging-country sample without explaining why the setting changes a finance question; papers that are primarily general management, marketing or accounting studies with only incidental financial content; and country descriptions that do not develop a broader theoretical, empirical or policy contribution.

Who Should Consider Submitting?

Researchers in finance, economics and related business disciplines may consider the journal when their paper asks a substantial finance question in an emerging-market context. This can include PhD scholars converting dissertation chapters into journal articles, faculty researchers working with cross-country or country-level financial data, economists examining policy-finance interactions, and interdisciplinary teams studying institutions, sustainability or development through a financial lens.

Journal-fit interpretation: A strong emerging-market setting is necessary but not sufficient. The manuscript should make clear what the setting allows the study to identify, test or explain that is relevant to the journal’s finance readership.

Journal Metrics, Scopus Indexing and Visibility

Elsevier’s current journal page shows CiteScore 8.8 and Impact Factor 4.6. It also lists Scopus and SSCI among the journal’s indexing services. A Wageningen University library record labeled “Scopus Journal Metrics (2024)” reports SJR 1.404, SNIP 1.916, CiteScore 8.8, a 90th-percentile rank in Economics and Econometrics, and Q1 status for that category.

These figures should be treated as reporting-year metrics rather than permanent attributes. Scopus quartiles can differ by category and year, and Impact Factor belongs to Clarivate’s Journal Citation Reports ecosystem. When a university specifically requires “Q1 in Scopus” or a current JCR quartile, save the live database record used for the decision.

Editorial Leadership and Publication Pattern

Elsevier currently lists R.C. Liao, PhD of Rutgers University Newark Business School as Editor-in-Chief, with a wider board of senior, co-, advisory, subject and associate editors across multiple countries and research specialties. Current issues include regular research articles as well as themed collections and special issues, demonstrating an active publication program with both general and topic-focused routes.

Article Types and What the Journal Publishes

Recent ScienceDirect issues identify the dominant substantive category as Research article; editorial content also appears, including editorial-board material and special-issue introductions. Because editorial systems can offer additional manuscript categories depending on calls for papers, authors should use the live “Guide for Authors” and submission portal as the definitive source for the available article type at the time they submit.

Regardless of category, published articles are expected by the journal’s stated scope to discuss next steps and possible extensions for future research in the conclusion. Authors should therefore avoid a conclusion that merely repeats coefficients; it should interpret contribution, limitations and realistic research extensions.

Open Access, APC and Copyright Route

Emerging Markets Review follows a hybrid model. Elsevier currently lists an open-access APC of USD 3,320 excluding taxes. The amount may be reduced through institutional agreements or other applicable arrangements. The subscription route is listed with no publication fee charged to authors, with access provided to subscribers. Authors should confirm the current license choices, funding eligibility and exact payable amount during submission rather than relying on a saved fee figure.

Peer Review, Acceptance Rate and Publication Timeline

Elsevier Journal Insights currently reports an 18% acceptance rate. This figure is useful as an indicator of journal selectivity but should not be translated into an individual acceptance probability. Manuscript quality, fit, novelty, design and editor/reviewer judgments remain decisive.

The same journal insights page currently reports 26 days from submission to first decision, 84 days to a decision after review, 269 days from submission to acceptance, and 5 days from acceptance to online publication. These are journal-level performance statistics, not promised deadlines for an individual paper. A desk rejection may be much faster; a paper needing multiple revision rounds may take considerably longer.

Manuscript and Submission Requirements: What Authors Should Verify

The live Elsevier Guide for Authors should be treated as the controlling submission document. Before uploading, authors should confirm the required manuscript category, file format, title-page details, anonymization instructions if applicable, abstract and keyword requirements, highlights or supplementary files, figure/table standards, data availability statements, declarations of interest, funding statements, AI-use declarations, authorship policy and reference presentation.

  1. Confirm scope first. Compare the manuscript’s research question with the official aims and several recent research articles.
  2. Select the correct article type. Use the submission system’s current category labels rather than guessing from older papers.
  3. Prepare all declarations. Include authorship, competing interests, funding and research-data information required by Elsevier and the journal.
  4. Check figures, tables and references. Ensure every in-text citation corresponds to the reference list and every table/figure is cited and clearly captioned.
  5. Verify submission links immediately before upload. Use the “Submit your article” control on the official ScienceDirect journal page to reach the current submission workflow.

Publication Ethics and Responsible Research

As an Elsevier journal, authors should expect compliance with publisher policies on research integrity, authorship, competing interests, plagiarism and duplicate submission, data and image integrity, corrections/retractions, responsible use of generative AI, and permissions for third-party material. Discipline-specific ethical approvals should be documented when the study design requires them.

Authors should never manipulate citations, fabricate data, obscure conflicts, submit the same manuscript simultaneously to multiple journals, or use language-editing support to misrepresent authorship or contribution. Ethical editing improves communication; it should not change the underlying scientific record.

Journal-Fit Checklist for Emerging Markets Review

Before choosing the journal, ask:

  • Is the central research question clearly about finance or financial institutions in emerging markets?
  • Does the paper explain why the emerging-market context matters theoretically or empirically?
  • If the study is single-country, are its implications meaningful beyond that country?
  • Does the paper engage with regional/global comparison, policy significance or financial architecture where relevant?
  • Is the methodology rigorous enough for a specialist empirical/theoretical finance readership?
  • Does the discussion connect results to prior international literature rather than only local studies?
  • Does the conclusion identify credible next steps and research extensions?

Three Practical Fit Examples

Likely stronger fit

Cross-country capital-flow study

A paper estimates how global monetary shocks affect corporate financing across several emerging markets and explains institutional heterogeneity. The regional comparison and finance mechanism align closely with the stated scope.

Potential fit

Single-country banking paper

A study uses a regulatory shock in one emerging economy to identify changes in credit supply. Fit becomes stronger when the policy mechanism and implications are connected to broader emerging-market financial architecture.

Potentially weak fit

Generic management survey

A survey of employee attitudes in an emerging economy may be rigorous, but if its central contribution is organizational behavior rather than finance, the geographic setting alone is unlikely to create journal alignment.

How to Prepare a Stronger Journal-Aligned Manuscript

As a practical publication-readiness step, begin with a one-paragraph “fit statement” for internal use: what finance problem the paper solves, why the emerging-market setting matters, what is new relative to the literature, and why the result matters outside the immediate sample. If this paragraph is difficult to write, journal fit may need more work before formatting.

Next, audit the introduction and discussion for global relevance. A paper can use local data yet answer an international question. Explain the institutional features of the setting without turning the article into a country primer. Place institutional detail where it improves identification, theory or interpretation.

For empirical papers, ensure variable definitions, sample construction, identification assumptions, robustness checks and limitations are easy to audit. For theoretical work, make the model’s emerging-market relevance explicit rather than attaching an emerging-market application after the theory is complete. In both cases, the conclusion should move beyond summary to interpretation, limitations and future research extensions.

Need a publication-readiness review?

Contentxprtz can support ethical manuscript editing, journal-fit review, language polishing, formatting, reference checks and submission preparation without promising acceptance.

Journal publication services

How Contentxprtz Can Ethically Support Authors

Contentxprtz may help researchers improve clarity, structure, scholarly tone, consistency, references, tables/figures, journal formatting, cover letters and reviewer-response documents. It can also help authors compare a manuscript against a journal’s published scope and prepare a submission-readiness checklist.

Such support is editorial and preparatory. It cannot substitute for the author’s research contribution, data integrity, methodological decisions or responsibility for the submitted work. It also cannot guarantee peer-review success, acceptance, indexing, citations or publication.

Authoritative Links to Recheck Before Submission

Summary

Emerging Markets Review is an Elsevier finance journal focused on high-impact empirical and theoretical research in emerging markets. It is indexed in Scopus and SSCI, and Elsevier currently displays CiteScore 8.8, Impact Factor 4.6 and an 18% acceptance rate. Its scope is strongest for work that extracts broader financial, institutional or policy insight from emerging-market evidence rather than relying on geography alone.

For authors, the most important pre-submission steps are to confirm the live Scopus/JCR metrics required by their institution, compare the manuscript with recent journal articles, verify the current Guide for Authors and submission categories, decide between subscription and open-access publication, and make the paper’s international finance contribution explicit.

Frequently Asked Questions

These answers summarize verified journal information and practical author guidance. Live metrics and policies should be reconfirmed before submission.

Is Emerging Markets Review indexed in Scopus?

Yes. Elsevier’s journal insights page lists Scopus among the journal’s abstracting and indexing services, and the supplied journal record identifies Scopus Source ID 14453. Authors who need indexing evidence for institutional assessment should still check the live Scopus source profile because coverage and source status can change.

What is the Scopus Source ID for Emerging Markets Review?

The supplied source record identifies Emerging Markets Review with Scopus Source ID 14453. The journal identity can also be cross-checked using its print ISSN 1566-0141 and online ISSN 1873-6173.

Who publishes Emerging Markets Review?

Emerging Markets Review is published by Elsevier, with North-Holland shown as the journal imprint in Elsevier’s journal comparison information.

What is the current CiteScore of Emerging Markets Review?

Elsevier’s current journal page displays a CiteScore of 8.8. Metrics are reporting-period dependent, so authors should verify the live figure in Scopus or on the journal page when using it for formal evaluation.

What is the Impact Factor of Emerging Markets Review?

Elsevier currently displays an Impact Factor of 4.6 for Emerging Markets Review. Authors should use Clarivate’s current Journal Citation Reports or the journal’s live page when they need the reporting year and category-specific JCR details.

Is Emerging Markets Review a Q1 journal?

A 2024 Scopus-metrics record from Wageningen University reports Q1 for Economics and Econometrics, with CiteScore 8.8, SJR 1.404 and SNIP 1.916. Quartiles can vary by year and subject category, so the latest Scopus category view should be checked before making a formal claim.

What topics fit Emerging Markets Review?

The journal focuses on empirical and theoretical research in emerging-markets finance. Its official scope particularly favors comparative global or regional studies, policy-relevant single-country work with wider implications, research on national and international financial architecture, and studies that integrate institutional and financial perspectives.

Does Emerging Markets Review charge an APC?

The journal offers both subscription and open-access publication routes. Elsevier currently lists an open-access APC of USD 3,320 excluding taxes, while the subscription route has no publication fee charged to authors. Waivers, discounts, agreements and taxes can change the amount payable, so authors should confirm the live fee at submission.

What is the acceptance rate of Emerging Markets Review?

Elsevier’s journal insights page currently reports an acceptance rate of 18%. This is a journal-level historical/operational metric, not a probability for any individual manuscript.

How long does peer review take?

Elsevier currently reports journal-level medians or averages of 26 days from submission to first decision, 84 days to a decision after review, 269 days from submission to acceptance, and 5 days from acceptance to online publication. These figures describe past journal performance and do not guarantee the timeline of a particular paper.

Who is the Editor-in-Chief?

Elsevier’s current editorial-board page names R.C. Liao, PhD, of Rutgers University Newark Business School, as Editor-in-Chief. Editorial appointments can change, so authors should check the live board before submission.

What article types appear in the journal?

The journal’s current issues predominantly label substantive papers as Research articles, and it also publishes editorial material and special-issue content. Authors should check the live Guide for Authors for the complete set of submission categories available in the editorial system.

What makes a manuscript a strong fit?

A strong candidate should make a clear contribution to emerging-markets finance, explain why the setting matters beyond a narrow local description, use a rigorous theoretical or empirical design, connect results to financial institutions or policy where relevant, and explain next research steps or extensions in the conclusion, which the journal explicitly expects in published papers.

Can Contentxprtz guarantee acceptance in Emerging Markets Review?

No. Contentxprtz can ethically support language editing, structure, formatting, references, journal-fit review and publication-readiness preparation, but editorial decisions are made independently by the journal and peer reviewers. No editing or submission-support service can guarantee acceptance or publication.

Conclusion

Emerging Markets Review can be a strong target for rigorous research that uses emerging-market settings to answer consequential finance questions. Its current indexing, citation metrics, selective acceptance rate and international editorial coverage make journal fit especially important: authors should evaluate contribution, methods and scope before spending time on formatting or submission.

Choose the journal because your research question and contribution belong there—not because a metric alone looks attractive.
Dr. Ananya Kulkarni
About the author

Dr. Ananya Kulkarni

Research Writer & Editorial Content Specialist

Dr. Ananya Kulkarni is a researcher and professional writer who specializes in transforming detailed information into clear, reliable, and reader-focused content. Her work reflects thoughtful analysis, editorial discipline, and a strong commitment to producing content that builds trust and professional authority.