Academy of Management Review: Scopus, Scope & Submission Guide
Academy of Management Review (AMR) is a quarterly Academy of Management journal focused on conceptual and theory-development contributions in management and organization studies. Its official mission is not to publish conventional empirical findings for their own sake, but to advance understanding by developing, challenging, clarifying, synthesizing, or reframing theory. For researchers deciding where to submit, that distinction is the most important starting point.
The journal is associated with Scopus Source ID 20206 in the supplied source record, and the official Academy of Management site reports 2025 Clarivate metrics including a Journal Impact Factor of 13.9. Those indicators establish scholarly visibility, but they do not answer the more practical question: does your manuscript make the kind of theoretical contribution AMR actually wants?
This guide brings together the journal’s official scope, identifiers, article types, submission rules, open-access policy, ethics requirements, editorial process, and publication-readiness considerations. It separates verified journal facts from practical interpretation so that PhD scholars, faculty members, early-career researchers, and international authors can evaluate AMR without relying on unsupported acceptance-rate or review-time claims.
Quick Answer: What Is Academy of Management Review?
Academy of Management Review is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by the Academy of Management. It is published quarterly in January, April, July, and October and concentrates on theoretical insights that advance understanding of management and organizations.
AMR describes itself as a theory-development journal for a global community of management and organization scholars. Its regular articles are conceptual rather than conventional empirical reports. A strong AMR manuscript typically develops new theory, materially revises or challenges existing theory, synthesizes ideas into a fresh theoretical explanation, delineates a novel theoretical problem, or improves the process of theory development.
Researchers considering AMR should verify three things before investing in a submission: whether the manuscript’s primary contribution is theoretical, whether that contribution matters to a broad management and organization readership, and whether the paper complies with the journal’s current author and submission requirements.
Key Takeaways
- Publisher: Academy of Management.
- Focus: conceptual research and theory development in management and organizations.
- Frequency: quarterly—January, April, July, and October.
- Identifiers: print ISSN 0363-7425; online ISSN 1930-3807; supplied Scopus Source ID 20206.
- 2025 Clarivate metrics: Impact Factor 13.9, five-year Impact Factor 19.3, Article Influence Score 10.19.
- Initial article length: generally no more than 30 double-spaced pages, excluding references, tables, and figures.
- Submission fee: AOM states that it does not charge submission fees.
- Open access: AOM supports Green Open Access/self-archiving under specified version and embargo conditions; it says it does not currently support author-funded Gold OA.
Journal Information at a Glance
| Field | Journal information |
|---|---|
| Journal name | Academy of Management Review (AMR) |
| Source type | Journal |
| Publisher | Academy of Management |
| Print ISSN | 0363-7425 |
| Online ISSN | 1930-3807 |
| Scopus Source ID | 20206 (supplied source record; verify current status in Scopus) |
| Primary field | Management and organization theory |
| Publication frequency | Quarterly: January, April, July, October |
| 2025 Impact Factor | 13.9 (Clarivate metric reported on official AOM journal page) |
| 2025 five-year Impact Factor | 19.3 |
| 2025 Article Influence Score | 10.19 |
| Current CiteScore / SJR / SNIP | Verify current value directly in Scopus; not reproduced here without authoritative current confirmation |
| Current Scopus quartile | Verify current category/year directly in Scopus |
| Submission fee | No submission fee according to AOM author resources |
| Open-access model | Green OA/self-archiving under AOM policy; AOM says it does not currently support author-funded Gold OA |
| Official journal page | Academy of Management Review |
| Submission guidance | Submitting to AMR |
| Scopus profile | Scopus Source ID 20206 |
Metric values are time-sensitive. For institutional compliance, always record the metric year and the subject category rather than treating a quartile or CiteScore as permanent.
What This Page Covers
- AMR’s mission, aims, scope, and subject orientation
- Scopus identification and official journal metrics
- What kinds of conceptual manuscripts fit—and what usually does not
- Article, Review Essay, and Dialogue formats
- Manuscript preparation, anonymization, and ScholarOne submission
- Peer review, editorial discretion, ethics, plagiarism screening, and AI disclosure
- Open-access and fee arrangements
- A practical AMR manuscript-fit and publication-readiness checklist
Methodology and Source Note
This profile was prepared from the official Academy of Management journal page, AMR-specific submission guidance, AOM author resources, AOM open-access policy, AOM editorial-team information, the journal platform, and the supplied Scopus source record. The official pages were checked for current information available on 10 August 2026.
Journal policies, editorial teams, indexing, metrics, and author instructions can change. Before submitting, researchers should recheck the official AMR page, the AMR submission page, the AOM style guide, and their institution’s own journal-recognition rules.
What Does Academy of Management Review Aim to Publish?
AMR’s central purpose is theoretical advancement. The official journal mission states that submissions must extend theory in ways that develop testable, knowledge-based claims. In practice, that gives authors several routes to contribution: creating new management or organization theory, substantially challenging or clarifying established theory, synthesizing recent advances into a fresh theoretical explanation, identifying a novel theoretical problem that opens a new line of inquiry, or improving theory-development processes.
The journal draws on the broad intellectual foundations of management research. AOM specifically notes disciplines such as economics, psychology, sociology, and social psychology, while also acknowledging contributions from less conventional perspectives including the humanities. This interdisciplinary openness is useful, but it does not mean that any conceptual paper is in scope. The contribution still needs organizational or management relevance and must speak to a scholarly conversation AMR readers recognize as important.
What “theory development” means for a prospective author
A manuscript is more likely to fit when it does more than rename constructs or combine familiar literatures. The paper should change how readers explain, connect, delimit, or question a management phenomenon. Strong conceptual papers often expose a contradiction, reveal an overlooked mechanism, alter boundary conditions, integrate disconnected theories, or present a coherent architecture that generates new research questions and testable claims.
Subjects and Research Themes That Can Fit AMR
Because AMR is a broad management journal, its subject range is defined less by a narrow topic list and more by whether the paper advances management and organization theory. Recent and established AMR work spans organizational behavior, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, governance, institutions, human resources, identity, diversity, work relationships, technology, artificial intelligence, social impact, organizational change, and the role of organizations in society.
| Potentially aligned topic | What would make it AMR-relevant |
|---|---|
| Artificial intelligence in organizations | A new theory of how AI changes coordination, authority, identity, knowledge, or organizational design—not merely a survey of adoption. |
| Entrepreneurship | A conceptual mechanism that revises how scholars explain venture emergence, persistence, failure, resource acquisition, or entrepreneurial identity. |
| Corporate governance | A theory that reframes board behavior, stakeholder relations, nonmarket action, or governance under changing institutional conditions. |
| Workplace diversity and identity | A new explanation of how identity, respect, stigma, inclusion, or social information processes operate across organizational contexts. |
| Strategy and innovation | A conceptual model that alters assumptions about competitive advantage, capability development, technological change, or strategic decision making. |
| Organizations and society | Theory addressing societal impact, institutions, public-private collaboration, responsibility, inequality, or organizational responses to disruption. |
These are illustrative fit examples, not an official exhaustive scope list. The best practical check is to compare your theoretical problem with recent AMR articles and “From the Editors” guidance, then ask whether your manuscript would alter a current theoretical conversation.
What Does AMR Publish?
AMR’s official submission page identifies three broad submission formats: Articles, Review Essays, and Dialogues.
Articles
Articles are the core theory-development format. They can develop new theories, challenge or refine current theory, synthesize advances, identify new theoretical problems, or improve theory development. Formal propositions are not mandatory. What matters is a persuasive theoretical contribution and clear implications for future research.
Review Essays
AMR also publishes Review Essays that allow scholars and practitioners to discuss how the arts and diverse scholarly literatures inspire scholarship connected to management theory, research, education, or practice. Authors should consult the current AMR page for the specific format and submission instructions before preparing this type of piece.
Dialogues
The Dialogues section provides a forum for brief comments on recently accepted AMR articles. It is not a substitute route for a full conceptual manuscript; it serves a different purpose—focused scholarly conversation around work entering the journal.
Is AMR a Good Match for Your Manuscript?
AMR is a strong target only when the manuscript’s main value is a meaningful theoretical advance. A technically polished paper can still be a poor fit if the intellectual contribution belongs elsewhere.
Strong fit signals
- The research question is fundamentally conceptual or theory-building.
- The manuscript explains why an existing theoretical account is incomplete, inconsistent, overly narrow, or unable to explain an important phenomenon.
- The new framework changes relationships among constructs, mechanisms, levels, boundary conditions, or assumptions.
- The contribution matters beyond a highly local context and speaks to management or organization scholars broadly.
- The paper generates clear research implications and potentially testable knowledge claims.
- The argument is disciplined, cumulative, and grounded in relevant literatures rather than driven by novelty language alone.
Warning signs
- The paper is primarily an empirical test with a standard hypotheses-results-discussion structure.
- The theoretical contribution is limited to adding one variable to a familiar model.
- The topic is mainly practitioner-oriented without a substantial scholarly theory contribution.
- The manuscript is a descriptive literature review rather than a theory-building synthesis.
- The core conversation belongs to another discipline and organizational relevance is peripheral.
- The paper mainly relabels known ideas without changing explanation or prediction.
Preparing and Submitting an AMR Manuscript
AMR uses AOM’s author requirements plus journal-specific rules. The safest approach is to treat the current official instructions as a submission checklist rather than waiting until the manuscript is finished.
Length and presentation
AMR says that initial article submissions should generally be no more than 30 double-spaced pages, excluding references, tables, and figures. The journal evaluates contribution in relation to length, so a longer manuscript needs to justify the space intellectually. Shorter, focused papers are explicitly welcome.
Blind manuscript file
AOM instructs authors to prepare a Microsoft Word document with the title page and all author-identifying references removed. Acknowledgements for help in preparing the paper should go in the cover letter submitted through the online system rather than in the blinded manuscript.
Submission portal
AMR submissions go through the journal’s ScholarOne Manuscripts site. New users create an account, provide profile and keyword information, enter submission metadata in the Author Center, and upload the blinded manuscript and required information.
Prior submission and exclusivity rules
AMR states that papers can be submitted only once. A paper that significantly overlaps a previously submitted AMR paper cannot simply be resubmitted. A materially new paper may be considered when the authors can explain a different theoretical framing and a substantially different issue or question. AMR also prohibits simultaneous review elsewhere and asks authors to remove online working-paper or prior-draft versions during the review period.
What Happens After You Submit?
AOM explains that manuscripts accepted for review enter a peer-review process in which subject-specific reviewers advise the editor on whether the work should be rejected, revised, or ultimately approved for publication. Multiple rounds of revision can occur. Editors retain substantial discretion over whether a manuscript is a fit for the journal.
Not every submission proceeds to external review. AOM’s general author resources explicitly note that many submissions can be declined without peer review when editors determine that the paper is not appropriate for the journal. For AMR, the most important way to reduce avoidable desk-rejection risk is to make the theoretical contribution unmistakable early in the manuscript and ensure that the problem is genuinely relevant to management and organization theory.
A current official average review duration was not found on the AMR pages reviewed for this guide, and the journal does not publicly state a current acceptance rate there. Those figures should not be inferred from unofficial websites.
Publication Ethics, Originality, and AI Use
AMR submissions operate under AOM’s publication policies and Code of Ethics. AOM states that it actively checks manuscript submissions for overlapping or similar text using Crossref iThenticate. Authors should therefore treat originality, attribution, quotation, citation accuracy, and transparent reuse of prior work as submission fundamentals rather than late-stage formatting issues.
AOM’s current AI policy says submitted work must be created by the authors and not be the product of artificial-intelligence tools unless AI use is appropriate to the research question and properly cited. Authors must disclose AI use transparently in the manuscript cover letter and acknowledgements and confirm that they understand AOM’s AI policy. Researchers should review the current AOM author resources before submission because these policies can evolve.
Open Access, Publication Fees, and Author Sharing
AOM’s open-access page states that it supports Green Open Access and currently does not support author-funded Gold Open Access. The policy distinguishes between versions of the manuscript and where and when they can be shared.
According to AOM, eligible Green OA sharing can involve preprints, accepted manuscripts, links to the final article, and repository sharing subject to stated conditions. The policy describes a 12-month embargo for public sharing of specified author-manuscript versions after publication. It also explains that AOM uses a CC BY-NC-ND license in its Green OA arrangements and that version-of-record and repository rights must be handled according to the current author guide.
AOM’s author resources separately state that the Academy of Management does not charge submission fees. Authors should not confuse that statement with article access, subscriptions, licensing, or any other post-acceptance publishing arrangements. Always confirm the current policy directly before submission.
How to Make a Conceptual Manuscript More AMR-Ready
Publication readiness for AMR is primarily intellectual. Language, structure, formatting, and references matter, but none can compensate for a weak theoretical contribution.
- State the theoretical problem precisely. Identify what current theory cannot adequately explain, not merely what previous studies have not examined.
- Map the current conversation. Use recent AMR articles and relevant journals to show how the problem sits within established theory.
- Identify the mechanism of contribution. Decide whether the paper develops new theory, challenges assumptions, integrates literatures, changes boundary conditions, or reframes a theoretical problem.
- Build a cumulative argument. Each section should logically move the reader from the limitation of current theory to the proposed explanation.
- Use constructs consistently. Define concepts carefully and avoid construct proliferation where existing terminology is adequate.
- Make research implications explicit. AMR expects theory articles to show what future research can test, examine, compare, or revise.
- Check contribution-to-length. Remove material that proves familiarity with the literature but does not move the argument forward.
- Read the current style guide before final formatting. Do not rely on an old downloaded version when the live AOM guidance is available.
AMR Submission Readiness Checklist
| Check | Publication-readiness question |
|---|---|
| Theoretical contribution | Can you explain in two or three sentences exactly how the paper changes an existing theoretical conversation? |
| AMR fit | Is the contribution centrally about management or organizations rather than only adjacent to the field? |
| Article type | Are you submitting the correct format—Article, Review Essay, or Dialogue? |
| Length | Is the initial article within the journal’s general 30-page guide, excluding references, tables, and figures? |
| Anonymity | Have title-page and author-identifying references been removed from the Word manuscript? |
| Prior submission | Have you disclosed any related previous AMR submission and explained material differences where required? |
| Exclusivity | Is the manuscript free from simultaneous review elsewhere? |
| Online posting | Have prior drafts or working-paper versions been handled in line with AMR’s current posting rule during review? |
| Ethics and originality | Are sources accurate, reuse transparent, and overlapping text appropriately handled? |
| AI disclosure | Does any AI use comply with AOM’s current policy and disclosure requirements? |
| References and style | Does the manuscript follow the current AOM Style Guide? |
| Cover letter | Are acknowledgements and relevant disclosures placed where AOM requires them? |
How Contentxprtz Can Support Publication Readiness
Preparing a conceptual manuscript for AMR can involve more than proofreading. Authors may need to improve argument architecture, define constructs consistently, remove repetition, align the paper with the current AOM style guide, check references, strengthen transitions, and make the theoretical contribution easier for editors and reviewers to locate.
Contentxprtz can provide ethical journal publication support, academic editing, manuscript editing, proofreading, journal formatting, reference and citation formatting, manuscript assessment, cover-letter editing, and reviewer-response editing. The purpose of that support is to improve the author’s presentation and publication readiness while preserving the author’s own ideas, theory, evidence, and responsibility.
Contentxprtz does not control AOM editorial decisions and cannot guarantee acceptance, peer-review success, indexing, publication speed, or publication in Academy of Management Review.
Summary: Academy of Management Review
Academy of Management Review is a quarterly Academy of Management journal devoted to conceptual and theory-development scholarship in management and organizations. Its current official journal page reports a 2025 Impact Factor of 13.9, a five-year Impact Factor of 19.3, and an Article Influence Score of 10.19. The supplied source record identifies Scopus Source ID 20206; researchers with Scopus-dependent institutional requirements should verify the current source status and current Scopus metrics directly before submission.
AMR is best suited to manuscripts whose central contribution is theoretical: developing new theory, materially challenging or clarifying established theory, integrating advances into a fresh explanation, defining an important new theoretical problem, or advancing theory-building itself. The journal’s submission guidance includes a general 30-double-spaced-page limit for initial articles, blinded Word-file preparation, ScholarOne submission, exclusivity requirements, and specific rules for previously submitted or publicly posted papers.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Academy of Management Review indexed in Scopus?
The supplied journal source record identifies Academy of Management Review under Scopus Source ID 20206. The journal is also widely recorded as a Scopus-indexed source. Because database status and metrics can change, authors whose university or PhD rules depend on current Scopus coverage should open the Scopus source profile and verify the active status immediately before submission.
What does Academy of Management Review publish?
Academy of Management Review primarily publishes conceptual and theory-development work about management and organizations. Its official guidance explains that articles should advance theory by developing new theory, substantially challenging or clarifying existing theory, synthesizing advances into fresh theory, identifying novel theoretical problems, or improving theory development. AMR also publishes Review Essays and Dialogues.
Does Academy of Management Review publish empirical papers?
AMR is fundamentally a theory-development journal rather than an empirical-results outlet. Empirical findings may motivate a theoretical problem, but a conventional empirical paper whose main contribution is data analysis is usually a better fit for another journal. Authors should judge their manuscript by whether its central contribution is a substantial conceptual advance.
What is the Academy of Management Review Impact Factor?
The official Academy of Management journal page currently reports a 2025 Clarivate Journal Impact Factor of 13.9, a five-year Impact Factor of 19.3, and an Article Influence Score of 10.19. Metrics are year-specific and can change, so they should be cited with the reporting year.
What is the Scopus Source ID for Academy of Management Review?
The supplied source record identifies Scopus Source ID 20206 for Academy of Management Review. The print ISSN is 0363-7425 and the online ISSN is 1930-3807.
Who publishes Academy of Management Review?
Academy of Management Review is published by the Academy of Management. The journal is one of AOM’s scholarly management journals and is published quarterly in January, April, July, and October.
How long should an initial AMR article submission be?
AMR’s current submission guidance says that, as a general guide, initial article submissions should not exceed 30 double-spaced pages, excluding references, tables, and figures. The journal emphasizes contribution-to-length rather than length for its own sake, and shorter focused manuscripts are welcome.
What file and anonymity requirements apply at submission?
AOM instructs authors to prepare a Microsoft Word file with the title page and author-identifying references removed. AMR submissions are made through the journal’s ScholarOne Manuscripts site. Acknowledgements of help should be placed in the cover letter rather than the blinded manuscript.
Does Academy of Management charge a submission fee?
AOM’s author resources state that the Academy of Management does not charge submission fees for its journals. This is distinct from subscription access or open-access arrangements after acceptance.
Is Academy of Management Review open access?
AMR operates within AOM’s publishing model. AOM states that it supports Green Open Access/self-archiving and currently does not support author-funded Gold Open Access. Public sharing of eligible author manuscripts is subject to AOM’s version and embargo rules, including a 12-month embargo for specified public sharing routes.
What is the acceptance rate for Academy of Management Review?
A current official acceptance rate was not found on the journal or AOM author pages reviewed for this guide. It should not be estimated from informal websites. Authors should focus instead on theoretical fit, originality, clarity, and compliance with AMR’s submission rules.
How long does peer review take at Academy of Management Review?
A current official average review duration was not found on the AMR author information reviewed for this guide. AOM explains that accepted-for-review manuscripts enter a peer-review process and may undergo multiple rounds of revision, but individual timelines vary.
Can a rejected AMR paper be resubmitted?
AMR states that papers can be submitted only once and that a paper significantly overlapping with a previously submitted paper cannot simply be resubmitted. A genuinely new submission may be considered when the authors can demonstrate a different theoretical framing and a substantially different theoretical issue or question.
Can an AMR manuscript be under review elsewhere?
No. AMR’s submission requirements state that a manuscript under review at AMR cannot simultaneously be under review elsewhere. The guidance also says that working papers or prior drafts posted online should be taken down during the AMR review process.
How can Contentxprtz support an AMR submission ethically?
Contentxprtz can support publication readiness through academic editing, proofreading, journal formatting, reference consistency, manuscript assessment, cover-letter editing, and reviewer-response editing. The researcher remains responsible for the theory, evidence, citations, authorship, disclosures, and final submission. Contentxprtz cannot guarantee acceptance or influence editorial decisions.
Conclusion: Should You Consider Academy of Management Review?
AMR is a credible and highly visible option for researchers with an ambitious conceptual contribution to management and organization theory. It is not simply a prestigious destination for any management manuscript; the paper must genuinely fit the journal’s theory-development mission and withstand close scrutiny of originality, logic, relevance, and research implications.
Before submitting, confirm the current AMR author guidance, AOM style requirements, Scopus status if your institution depends on it, and any updated publication-policy details. If the theoretical contribution is strong but the manuscript needs clearer structure, cleaner academic language, more consistent references, or journal-aligned formatting, professional editorial support can help improve readiness without replacing the author’s scholarship.
At Contentxprtz, we don’t just edit; we help ideas reach their fullest potential.
